Linux-Hardware Digest #438, Volume #9 Mon, 15 Feb 99 13:13:36 EST
Contents:
Re: Problem with PCI modem (Rob Clark)
X crashes, no AfterStep! (PERSON654)
Scanner on parallel port (Piero Procacci)
Opinion on Mobo & Chip Choice (grinder)
Re: Linux and Acer travelmate 312/313T (Matthew Faupel)
Re: Performance problems with AIC7xxx (Sebastian Goettel)
Help : Need to recover my partitions (longish) (David Cook)
Multiple Line ISDN boards on Linux? ("Tycho Schenkeveld")
AHA-1530P/1532P not recognised (Patrick Sibenaler)
Re: ls120 Floppy Drive IDE Help!! ("James D. McIninch")
Wheel in X (Dana A Levine)
Re: Lemarx ColorJet 1000 (Julian Thomas)
Re: Linux and "Winprinters" (Christopher B. Browne)
BIG TEST PENTIUM 3 ("David Summer")
Is it the Mouse or the Video Display? (Bill Polhemus)
Re: Quake II and non-Voodoo OpenGL (Andre Heynatz)
Re: Help - Rockwell PCI V.90 Modem (Matt Zagni)
Linux and "Winprinters" (Mark Bratcher)
Modem - I want a good solid and easy setup suggestion ("David Beecher")
Re: MT5634ZPX-PCI modem (Nathan Cuka)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Problem with PCI modem
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:27:37 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Haris Teguh Widjaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My modem is Acer Aopen FMH-56H with Rockwell chip
It's a controllerless winmodem:
http://www.aopenusa.com/products/modem/default.htm
It won't work because some modem functions are left off the card and
emulated by Windows software. Without the special software, it's
of no use to you.
Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PERSON654)
Subject: X crashes, no AfterStep!
Date: 1 Feb 1999 23:03:26 GMT
Yo,
I don't have Afterstep, and selected it as my manager in X windows. How might
i go about to change that without using X windows? (X Windows auto closes when
it can't find Afterstep, it just goes out). Does anyone have ANY idea what i
should do??
Thanx in advance
Matt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nirvanakicks.conk.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Piero Procacci)
Subject: Scanner on parallel port
Date: 15 Feb 1999 14:26:16 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Piero Procacci)
I bought a PRIMAX scanner to be connected to the parallel
port. I installed the SANE package on my PC with
ReadHat 5.2 just to realize that SANE does not support
my scanner and in general does not support scanners on the
parrallel port. The question to ng is:
can I make my scanner working somehow?
Piero
--
Piero Procacci
Chem. Dept., University of Florence (Italy),
Via G.Capponi 9 I-50121 Firenze
FAX: +39+55 2476961
Tel +39+55 2757448
------------------------------
From: grinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Opinion on Mobo & Chip Choice
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 07:39:01 -0500
I'm planning an upgrade to a dfi BV3+ and a K6-300.
Would like opinions from others that might have this chip/mobo
Also any specific advice on moving linux to the new Mobo?
I'm currently using an abit PX5 and a K6-233.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: Matthew Faupel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and Acer travelmate 312/313T
Date: 15 Feb 1999 13:42:24 +0000
Wolfram Saringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> raoul signorile wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for someone who has installed linux on Acer travelmate
> > 312/313T subnotebook.
> > I want to know if everything (video card, audio, cdrom and modem) works
> > well under linux o.s.
>
> I did install it via a DOS partition. Did not try to get the sound card
> working, as I do not have any need for it.
Sound works fine (subject to getting the right PnP settings and permissions
on the audio devices).
> The modem will be of some interest, the cdrom is the problem why I am
> here: I cannot get it working. It just gives I/O errors when accessing the
> disk (i.e. mounting it), although it seems to be recognized as an ATAPI
> Disk. Same for the SuSE 6.0 boot disk: After loading the PCMCIA drivers,
> it says, yes, there is a CDROM, no, I cannot mount it...
See my fix on http://www.angelfire.com/ca/Amnesiac/acer.html
> The video card works fine. Its a Neomagic chip that is supported by XFree
> (at least the version included with SuSE 6.0.
>
> Hope that helps. If there are any news regarding the CDROM, please let me
> know. BTW: 32MB RAM are not enough.
Seems OK for me (runs WP8 without complaining, which is about all I've done
with it so far).
Cheers,
Matthew
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:05:05 +0100
From: Sebastian Goettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Performance problems with AIC7xxx
Somebody was wondering if /dev/sdc might be a CD-Writer. It's a 18G disk
drive.
Sebastian
===========================================>8 cut here==
_ Sebastian G�ttel
_|_|_ SCHEMA GmbH
|_| |_| Electronic Documentation Solutions
Andernacher Str. 18 Tel +(49)911 - 586 861-43
D - 90489 Nuernberg Fax +(49)911 - 586 861-70
Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW http://www.schema.de
========================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Cook)
Subject: Help : Need to recover my partitions (longish)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 14:12:30 GMT
Summary : Something is very confused, either in my partition tables
or BIOS or elsewhere. Also, I seem to have hard disk problems.
The details : I have two IDE hard disks - one 2.5 Gb, one 6.4 Gb.
The 2.5 G is the original disk in the machine, and has 520Mb DOS/W95
partition, the rest for Linux (5 partitions - swap, /, /var, /usr and
/home). The 6.4 is a relatively recent addition, and contains swap,
/, /var, /usr and /home partitions (much larger ones than the ones on
the 2.5 G).
I am running RedHat 4.0, I have a Cyrix 6x86 P133, 96M RAM,
IDE CD-ROM, sound card, Matrox Millenium, modem.
When I bought the 6.4 G drive, I was intending to install a newer
version of Linux onto it (rather than risk "breaking" my system with
glibc/libc issues [1] ), copy over all my old files, backup all the
DOS files I wanted to keep, then give DOS more of the 2.5 G drive
(perhaps all, if I was feeling generous :-).
What actually happened : I copied over the contents of the 2.5 G
drive, then did nothing about if for a few months (because what I
really want to do is back up eveyrthing, but I don't have a tape
drive, but if I do get one I really would prefer a SCSI one, but then
I should upgrade my hard disks to SCSI, but then I'll have wasted lots
of money on the new IDE one ... etc etc - I'm a champion ditherer ;-)
So, just over a week ago, my computer froze (it does this from time to
time, I suspect intense video activity is some sort of factor, but
this sort of random freeze is hard to track down, and it occurs rarely
enough that it hasn't seemed worth the effort).
Upon coming back up, when trying to mount the partitions from the 2.5
Gb, I saw the following :
hda : read_intr : status = 0x59 (DriveReady SeekComplete
DataRequestError }
hda : read_intr : error=0x40 { Uncorrectable Error },
LBAsect=1154583, sector=33687
end_request : I/O error, dev 03:03, sector 33687
... and then nothing more (had to be powered down).
Next, I installed RH 5.1 on a spare 500Mb on my girlfriend's computer
(to access man pages, HOWTOs, etc, in case there was something useful
on there). I wrote boot and rescue disks, booted up ok, and even
managed to mount the partitions from the 2.5 Gb and 6.4 Gb drives.
Unfortunately, instead of doing the sensible thing at this point and
copying the files from 2.5 to 6.4 drive, I decided to try to get the
2.5 G drive working properly. I ran lilo again (by mounting the
partitions on that drive, running a "chroot" to the root of it, then
running lilo with the original config on that drive). That didn't
help. I tried restoring the boot sector that I originally wrote when
installing RH 4.0, but that just took out LILO and left that drive
booting W95.
At this point, I think, the partition table on the drive also went
bad. When I boot into rescue mode and run fdisk, it shows that the
first partition /dev/hda1 occupies cylinders 1 to 520 (as it did
before), but each cylinder is now 8064*512 bytes, which means
/dev/hda1 (DOS partition) takes up most of the drive, and some 800,000
sectors are left unallocated. I think it used to be cylinders 1 to
520, but 1024 (or a number close to that) * 512 bytes.
Now I am at a loss. It is possible (maybe) that I can dig through the
last two years worth of pieces of paper that I have accumulated to
find the original partition settings for that drive (yes, I did write
them down, but I've moved since then and they could be anywhere among
thousands of other pieces of paper) - but will that even do me any
good ? I am reasonably sure that nothing has been written to the
drive since the partition table was lost - can I recreate the old one
and access all the old information ? Is there something else I can do
to get at the Linux partitions on that drive ? (... and then
immediately copy everything across to the good (and now bootable)
drive). Or, should I accept that I've lost 3 months worth of
news/mail/files/changes/programs (or maybe pay lots of money to a data
recovery service ? ) ?
Also: the read_intr messages I was getting from the 2.5 Gb drive - do
they mean that the drive has "gone bad" ? (a DejaNews posting I read
suggested that that meant the drive had more bad sectors than the
BIOS/drive/something-or-other could cope with - is that the case ?).
So, to summarise again : I have two problems. A hard drive that may
be going bad or gone bad, but I could (for a while) still read the
data from. Partition tables that have gone bad. I need to at least
recover from the partition tables - if I can do that and copy the old
stuff over, I can reformat (low level format ?) the 2.5 Gb drive and
install things afresh on there.
If you can help, contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or post
here (but I don't guarantee being able to catch replies here, due to
lack of time and having to deal with a stolen bicycle too :-( )
[1] I don't know that there neccessarily would be any - but I'm not
convinced enough that there wouldn't be, either. Besides, it was
about time to do a clean install, and then keep better track of any
changes I make to the system configuration.
Thanks in advance,
David.
(david.cook at pobox.com)
(in Melbourne, Australia)
------------------------------
From: "Tycho Schenkeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multiple Line ISDN boards on Linux?
Date: 15 Feb 1999 14:19:13 GMT
Hello Everyone!
I'm about to start a project involving a multi-line ISDN voice board, and
I'd like to use Linux as the server. I found several boards from Dialogic
and they support Unix, but I don't think they specifically support Linux
(There was little information about this subject). I'm wondering if anyone
out here has ever used such a board with Linux. I'd be grateful for any
information on this subject.
Greetings from Lelystad, in Holland!
Tycho Schenkeveld
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:22:45 +0100
From: Patrick Sibenaler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AHA-1530P/1532P not recognised
Help!
Does anyone know how to get the AHA-1530P to be recognised?
I've been through all the modules and could not find any
reference...
any help deeply appreciated!
greets,
patrick./
--
===========================================================================
The trick is to communicate bi-directional in real time and high
resolution
===========================================================================
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 09:34:22 -0500
From: "James D. McIninch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ls120 Floppy Drive IDE Help!!
Giordani Fabio wrote:
>
> LS 120 Floppy Driver ATAPI interface (hdd?)(120 Mbytes & 1.44 Mb floppy).
> I need mounting !
> Help Please !
mount -t vfat /dev/hdd /mnt/floppy
------------------------------
From: Dana A Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wheel in X
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:14:18 -0500
I have a Logitech Firstmouse + (Two Buttons and a wheel/button). I am
interested in getting the wheel to work under X. Does anyone know how to
do this?
TIA
-Dana
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julian Thomas)
Subject: Re: Lemarx ColorJet 1000
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:04:52 -0500
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/13/99
at 07:10 PM, "Nic Holbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have a lexmark 5700 series, and it doesn't run under linux, either. I
>called the company, and they it uses the same sort of driver setup as a
>winmodem.....???? WinPrinters??? I think so. If i'd known this, I
>wouldn't have bought the damn thing..........
There are win printers, but this isn't one of them. As someone else
points out, it is well supported for OS2. If some other lexmark printers
show up in printtool (or whatever driver list you have) you might try that
driver.
--
Julian Thomas: jt at epix dot net http://home.epix.net/~jt
Boardmember of POSSI.org - Phoenix OS/2 Society, Inc http://www.possi.org
In the beautiful Finger Lakes Wine Country of New York State!
-- --
Windows95 Users: Crash Test Dummies.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher B. Browne)
Subject: Re: Linux and "Winprinters"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:50:24 GMT
On 15 Feb 1999 14:15:12 GMT, Mark Bratcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
>If a printer company were so motivated, is it possible for them to
>create a /dev/lp-something driver that could allow Linux to print to a
>"windows" printer, or is it simply impossible in the Linux architecture?
See the URL below for more details; the quick answer is that it is not
completely implausible, but seems quite unlikely to actually happen.
--
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/printing.html>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - "What have you contributed to Linux today?..."
------------------------------
From: "David Summer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.homedesigned,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.computer.hardware,comp.forsale.hardware,comp.hardware,comp.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.publish.cdrom.hardware,comp.sy
Subject: BIG TEST PENTIUM 3
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 14:04:48 +0100
PENTIUM 3 test:
http://members.tripod.com/~igorja/oc/home.htm
------------------------------
From: Bill Polhemus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Is it the Mouse or the Video Display?
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:49:44 -0600
Hi. I have a problem (of course!)
First, a preface: I am what used to be called a "computer hobbyist,"
back before we all got so serious with our boxes, using them to make
money, in businesss, etc. Oh, I still have to use my computer at work
to DO work, but I love to tinker.
Way back in 1993, I bought a new 486-66 (generic clone), and decided
that I really didn't like that Windows thingie that everyone was
beginning to use, since it wasn't "32-bit" like my new computer. So I
installed OS/2 2.0, and the rest was history. I used OS/2 up until
about a year and a half ago, when it was obvious I couldn't get any work
done at home with it (since we were using NT at work, and the apps
wouldn't go on my OS/2 system).
However, as you might imagine, I got a LOT of experience, tinkering with
the OS/2 system, applying patches, upgrades, fixpaks, adding hardware
and trying to get OS/2 to recognize it.
I thought those days were gone forever.
Then, the other day, I splurged and bought a new computer system for
home, came (of course) with Windows 98 and all the trimmings. A nice
machine, which the wife and I can use for our productivity stuff at
home.
But here is my old 486, still perfectly good, just sitting there waiting
to be retired.
So, on a hunch, I bought a copy of Red Hat Linux 5.2 at the store where
I purchased the new machine. Only $20. I'd heard a lot about it (and
remember that Linux advocates had often spilled over onto the
comp.os.os2.* newsgroups back when I used to haunt them myself). I was
intrigued, and had the idea that this could signal the resumption of my
"hobbyist" career put on the shelf when I abandoned (reluctantly) OS/2.
Well, I finally got the install begun last night. So far so good, but
of course I've already run into a problem with (I'm sure this is no
surprise to most reading here) hardware compatibility.
Now, I've got old, "legacy" hardware. The 486 is and ISA bus machine,
and the video card is a Diamond SpeedStar 64 ISA, which I believe uses
the Cirrus Logic chipset. As far as I can tell, the install routine was
able to pick up the display, and "configure" it. The mouse is
problematic; it's a three-button job I got for about $15 at Wal-Mart
when my last Microsoft Mouse went kablooey. On the bottom of the mouse,
there is a slider switch you can set for "MS AM" (not sure what the "AM"
stands for--"adorable mouse?") and "PC AT". It has a PS/2 plug on the
end, but came with an adapter which I simply plugged into the COM1 port
when I was using Windows 95.
Anyway, for some reason, when I startup up the X Windows system, it
comes up O.K., but the MOUSE doesn't seem to work. The cursor just
flies all over the place, all around the periphery of the screen,
seemingly uncontrollable.
I THINK that the window manager is FVWM2 (at least I remember seeing
that designation somewhere on the screen); someone here familiar with
Red Hat 5.2 will probably know. Anyway, I can't get the X Windows
environment to function; very frustrating.
What do any of you think? Any suggestions for "fixing" this problem?
Oh, BTW, the setup is (off the top of my head): i486DX2-66 all-ISA, 20MB
RAM, 1.03MB Conner HD, 24X Toshiba ATAPI CDROM, Diamond SpeedStar 64 ISA
Video with 1 MB RAM, Iomega ZIP Drive (Parallel).
Thanks for any help you could render.
Regards.
Bill Polhemus
Houston, Texas
------------------------------
From: Andre Heynatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Quake II and non-Voodoo OpenGL
Date: 15 Feb 1999 14:11:27 +0100
Paul Nevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From what I have read the OpenGL support does use hardware acceleration
> for a large number of other cards. I have not played with the software
> yet but it would be nice to get OpenGL hardware acceleration on my
> 3DLabs Permedia II 8Mb Card.. for the purposes of running Quake II of
> course.
>
> If anyone has had any success with this configuration please let me
> know.
Hello Paul!
I have had success in configuring a Permedia-2 based system for hw
accelerated OpenGL. Please look on my homepage for further
instructions:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~tron/linux/pm2conf.html
It is a pre-alpha driver, but it works. Hopefully, the graphics chip
companies begin to recognize soon that Linux is widely used for scientific
visualization, much more than Win NT at my work for example (the trend
is less NT in the future). Until then the 3Dfx and 3Dlabs
Permedia/GLINT products are the only ones supported by a free driver
(the driver should be free because it is free for Win, too).
I haven't tried Quake II yet, but it should work with any OpenGL
compatible driver (like the Mesa driver used in my configuration).
Thanks to S.u.S.E. and the Mesa team for the great work!
Greetings,
--
Andr� Heynatz
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~tron/
Support non-Wintel (http://www.convergence.org/)
------------------------------
From: Matt Zagni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup.hardware,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup
Subject: Re: Help - Rockwell PCI V.90 Modem
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:11:34 +0000
About a week ago I asked for advice on setting up a 56k modem
I thought it maybe worthwhile mailing this to the above lists
if anyone had the same problems.
My modem turned out to be a...
Modular Tech site is www.modulartech.com
there is a modem driver for win95/98 and NT for this
card and a faq. The driver is called hcfv135.zip for win95
but also there is a driver for NT too.
Model Modem Number is 608463 560HCF it runs on a rockwell
chipset of RLVDL56DPF/SP 9844 B69792.2
As yet there is no driver for linux if people ask
but one is due soon. (unless any linux users have overcome
this small problem) PS I perfer linux more than windows
a much more user feindly os and well easy to config in places
too. however some of us use two os's just in case ?
another site that was mentioned was..
http://website.lineone.net/~adcox/index.htm
and
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html (for us linux users)
I hope it will work now.
Matt (perfers linux, but will confess to be a windows user too
at times).
------------------------------
From: Mark Bratcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux and "Winprinters"
Date: 15 Feb 1999 14:15:12 GMT
Hi.
If a printer company were so motivated, is it possible for them to
create a /dev/lp-something driver that could allow Linux to print to a
"windows" printer, or is it simply impossible in the Linux architecture?
I'm just curious...
Mark
------------------------------
From: "David Beecher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Modem - I want a good solid and easy setup suggestion
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 08:19:54 -0500
Any suggestions on a good modem! My Atlas 33.6 modem died. It was very
reliable while it lasted. Now I'm having a hell of a time at retail stores
finding a non-Winmodem. The 28,800 I had in the system, that I am using now
is not reliable and I need a 56k replacement.
I saw an earlier suggestion for a ZOOM 2949 external, but would prefer an
internal modem. Inexspensive is always a good thing.
Any modem suggestions that would require minimal thinking on my part would
be a first choice regardless of price. Fax and voice options are not needed
or wanted.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
David R. Beecher
------------------------------
From: Nathan Cuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.binaries.warez.linux,alt.comp.linux.isp,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.dial-up,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: MT5634ZPX-PCI modem
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 10:01:52 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a Multitech MT5634ZPX-PCI modem its not a "winmodem" and it will
> operate under Unix,OS2,windows and according to Multitech Linux as well
> "in therory". I've see people posting articles claiming that this modem
> should work but I have yet to see anyone back it up with any facts ect.
> I'm begining to think that I'm wasting my time messing with this modem
> but right now I just want to prove it does or doesn't work.
>
> My Windows 98 Modem Settings are:
>
> IRQ 11
> COM 5
> UART 16550AN
>
> Do I set my Linux settings to match my windows settings ? Example:
> setserial /dev/ttys4 IRQ 11 UART 16559
>
> When I use the setserial command It shows the changes have been made but
> I'm unable to get the modem to anything. I can use minicom to dial and it
> says its dailing but it just hangs there.
>
> anyone has any ideas??
> >
You need to set the port address as well as the IRQ and UART settings.
Also, make sure that your changes are taking effect by typing
setserial /dev/ttys4.
I have had a bad experience with this modem however.
I was able to get a MultiModem ZPX PCI "working" on my box (Redhat 5.2,
2.0.36 kernel). It was able to respond to commands, dial out, etc.. However,
I found that the modem failed to *consistently* work properly -- either
in win98 or linux. The problem which I would have is that it would work
once or twice after I installed it, but after rebooting a couple of times
it would become non-responsive in linux, and in win98 I
would get "couldn't open port" error messages. The only way to fix it
was to take out the board and put it in another PCI slot. Tech support
at multimodem eventually (after trying a couple of fixes) suggested that I
get an external modem. Bzzzttt. Wrong answer. I am currently trying to
get a refund.
Hope that you have better luck than I did...
=======================================================
| Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Neoglyphics Media Corporation.........http://www.neog.com
|
| I put a dollar in one of those change machines. Nothing changed...
=======================================================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
