Linux-Hardware Digest #998, Volume #9 Mon, 12 Apr 99 01:13:24 EDT
Contents:
Re: Building a Better Distribution. (WAS: X munges the graphics card? (Re: Windows
2000 Rah! Rah! Session falls flat)) (Bloody Viking)
Re: stealth II s220 (Brian Matthew Sperlongano)
Re: DMA errors ("TURBO1010")
Re: 2.2.3 doesnt boot from extended partition (Wilhelm Wienemann)
Re: 3com / US robotics 56K ("Greg Rudd")
Re: Compiling PCMCIA under kernel 2.2.4? (Mohd H Misnan)
Re: Telepath Modem for Windows with X2 ("Nathan Cook")
Re: Telepath Modem for Windows with X2 ("Nathan Cook")
Re: Inaccessible boot device: HELP! (NT Error, Linuxes fault?) (James Stafford)
Re: Netgear ISA EA201c NIC (J. P.)
Video card help... please... ("Groman")
Re: 2 Ethernet Cards - IRQ/Address Conflict? Help! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SBLive!
Help configuring hispeed serial card (Albert Chin-A-Young)
Re: Help - How to Remove Red Hat ? (Tom Fleischman)
modem setup (Tavin Cole)
Re: laptops and linux (David Fox)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bloody Viking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Building a Better Distribution. (WAS: X munges the graphics card? (Re:
Windows 2000 Rah! Rah! Session falls flat))
Date: 12 Apr 1999 02:37:37 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Todd Ostermeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Perfect for an OEM, perhaps. Perfect for a normal user? Not even close
: (and remember, your average Joe who builds his own machine can get an OEM
: copy of Windows for it, rather than buying off-the-shelf). Manufacturers
: who use the Recovery Disk style of system setup are considered bad, in my
: book (what happens if an app that came pre-installed needs to be
: reinstalled, but you only have it in the tarball on the Recovery Disk?).
I did admit it would be excellent for OEMs. It would end up being like a
Packrat Bell CD.
: You think maybe a choice should be given here? Yes, we all know you hate
: LILO. However, in an OEM situation, either the hardware will work with
: Linux and LILO, or the OEM shouldn't be offering Linux. Not to mention
That's a bit elitist with the LILO. Of course, a distribution could be
made to allow choice of using LILO or Loadlin and install what the user
chooses to install. Had Red Hat offered the choice of installing LILO or
not, the disaster would not have happened. With the choice available, you
could install with LILO (as most Linux fans do) or install with Loadlin
(as I do).
For an OEM distro, they had better get the LILO right! For a non-OEM
distro, it would be nice to have the choice of boot methods as part of the
install. Currently with Red Hat, you have to kill the box come the LILO
install part.
: the confusion on the user's end when they buy the machine, plug it in,
: turn it on, and see it boot into DOS. I'm sure a number of clueless users
: would have some irrate words for whatever OEM went this route (even if
: they used FreeDOS, and went straight to Linux after booting to DOS, it
: still boots to DOS first). No, LILO makes a much better boot loader in
: this area, especially if you're talking about OEM's, as that is a
: very controlled environment (hey, they built the machine, after all).
I never thought of that for an OEM and LILO! That is a valid argument
favouring LILO for an OEM.
: While you're at it, why not have the user supply a username/password combo
: during the setup, so that they need not log in as root (or are you one of
: those people who does everything as root?).
That would be good for all distributions. Slackware defaults to a
password-free root! Red Hat makes you specify the root password. Your idea
would be even better, letting the owner specify a root password AND a
username of a normal account so he doesn't get into the dangerous habit of
doing everything as root. BTW, you did guess correctly that I have that
dangerous habit of doing everything as root.
Thanks for the input! The ideal distro for general sale would end up being
like Red Hat to allow choice of packages but your idea of defining a
normal account is a good addition. It would also be good to allow choice
of boot methods for both LILO and Loadlin fans.
I'd like to know how to get to the Red Hat setup proggie on the floppy so
if I take the source and modify it, I can replace the setup proggie with
the Loadlin version.
--
CAUTION: Email Spam Killer in use. Leave this line in your reply! 152680
First Law of Economics: You can't sell product to people without money.
3869387 bytes of spam mail deleted. http://www.wwa.com/~nospam/
------------------------------
From: Brian Matthew Sperlongano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: stealth II s220
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:15:39 -0400
This driver is available with the XBF package, available from RedHat.
grab the XBF servers and the custom xf86config tarballs. Doing a seach
for "XBF" on FTPSearch should point you in the right direction.
-Brian
> > I am looking for a driver or a work around for configuring my video card
> > of
> >
> > stealth II s220 Rendition v2100
> >
> > any help would be nice..
> >
> > ttfn
> > goat
>
> The driver is available with the newest release of X. You will have to
> upgrade to the new release.
>
> www.xfree.org
>
> www.cdrom.com
>
> Later,
> Fred
>
>
>
===================================
Brian Matthew Sperlongano
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
(508) 831-6282 (School)
(401) 828-0746 (Home)
Senator, Student Gov't Association
===================================
------------------------------
From: "TURBO1010" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: DMA errors
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 20:14:59 -0700
I can see the bios, and the bios installs, just can't fdisk, or anything.
It tells me that no drives are present. With linux, it fails to load the
module for the adaptec 294X .
Nick Lucent wrote in message ...
>On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:38:49 -0700, TURBO1010 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
><>It's an HX chipset, and disabling UDMA in the bios took the errors away.
><>Trying SCSI now, just can't get it to recognize my Adaptec 2940U2W.
><>
>
>your right, Im just out of it tonight. Ive used a aha2940uw w/ mine, I
would
>imagine them to be similar. Are you not seeing the adaptec bios come up on
>boot?
>
>Nick
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wilhelm Wienemann)
Subject: Re: 2.2.3 doesnt boot from extended partition
Date: 10 Apr 1999 15:27:49 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wilhelm Wienemann)
Oliver Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> informed
comp.os.linux.hardware with the following:
> on my old 486 laptop, which works fine with 2.0.x, I can't get 2.2.3
> starting from first partition in extended space. I tried the old and the
> new (E)IDE-driver, several boot-options, but with no success.
>
> The hard-disk is in LBA-mode and is recognized right.
> Root-device is hda5, that's ok. Strange is what follows:
>
> > Partition check:
> > hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 < > hda4
> > attempt to access beyond end of device
> > 03:05: rw=0, want=2, limit=0
> > EXT2-fs: unable to read superblock
> > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:05
>
> 2.0.36 doesn't have this problem. What now? Cleaning disk, waiting for
> 2.2.x?
Hi Oliver!
What's telling you a linux 'fdisk -l'?
Maybe you can post the message to give us more information.
bye - Wilhelm
--
>>>>>>>>> Wilhelm Wienemann, Amselweg 10, D-47546 Kalkar/Germany <<<<<<<<<
==========>>>>> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<<<<===========
"And since you are the future keepers of everything, including music, we
hope you will keep it well, with love, and in joy." (Frederick Fennell)
------------------------------
From: "Greg Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: 3com / US robotics 56K
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 03:55:24 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7eofpf$6tf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>
>I'm trying to find a 56K modem that will work under linux. I checked the
>"Linux modems list," aka "Winmodems are not modems," and discovered that
the
>3com / USRobotics Sportster 56K, model 1785, allegedly works fine.
>
>The problem is that I can't find any of these being sold anywhere. The
>closest model number I can find is 1787, and I can't find any technical
>details that tell if this one would probably be compatible, too. I'm
curious
>if anyone else out there has had any success with this model.
>
>Also, if you know of another 56K modem that works well with linux, I
wouldn't
>mind hearing about that, either.
>
>thanks in advance for any advice,
>rob kent
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
The 3COM/U.S. Robotics 56K V90 External Faxmodem, model 5686 works great on
my system. Purchased from BUY.COM for $115.
On my system (RedHat 5.2) put the following line in the
/etc/rc.d/rc.serial file:
/bin/setserial /dev/ttyS0 spd_vhi.
The spd_vhi flag allows the modem to communicate with the PC at speeds over
38400bps on the serial port.
Regards,
Greg Rudd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mohd H Misnan)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: Compiling PCMCIA under kernel 2.2.4?
Date: 5 Apr 1999 22:07:55 GMT
Reply-To: mhmsys$pc,jaring,my
>Hugh Griffiths wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am upgrading my 2.2.3 kernel (supplied with Slackware v4.0.0) to
>> 2.2.4 After an installation of Slackware PCMCIA worked fine. However,
>> when I obtained the source code for 2.2.4 and configured it I was unable
>> to find ANY reference to PCMCIA support. Is it true that tke kernel
>> needs to be compiled with PCMCIA support in order to succeed in using
>> it? if not how do I get round the problem
PCMCIA is not bundled with the kernel, you need to get your own PCMCIA package.
I think the most recent one is pcmcia-cs-3.0.9 (which the one am using). The
PCMCIA package can be found in sunsite.unc.edu but I don't remember in which
directory tho', most probably inside the kernel directory.
--
|Mohd Hamid Misnan|[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |i|
|MacOS 8.5.1 + |http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/3319/ |M|
|AMD K6-2/300 + |We want to take over the world, but we don't have to |a|
|Linux 2.2.5+RH5.2|do it tomorrow. It's OK by next week - Linus Torvalds |c|
------------------------------
From: "Nathan Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telepath Modem for Windows with X2
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:11:14 -0700
The "telepath for windows" denotes that it is a proprietary windows-only
modem.
sorry man
I had the same problem (different modem) but I had to go buy a new one too.
Nathan
nathanc@[antispam]rmci.net
Ellamenno Pee wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a telepath modem for windows with X2 from Gateway. I was not
>sure if this was a winmodem for sure, or if there was hope. I tried
>using pnpdump and isapnp. After running setserial on the specified
>port, the modem clicks twice and picks up the line. ( kinda weird). I
>tried sending AT commands to it but it does not seem to respond to
>them. I called Gateway to get some additional information, and they
>assured me that none of the modem's functionality is software based. I
>am told that the only thing that would not work is some of the voice
>features (it's a voice/data modem). Now I am thoroughly confused. Any
>information about this would be greatly appreciated. Also, what is the
>difference between the Telepath for Windows with X2 and the Telepath 56k
>if anyone knows?
>
>The Nut
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: "Nathan Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telepath Modem for Windows with X2
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:11:14 -0700
The "telepath for windows" denotes that it is a proprietary windows-only
modem.
sorry man
I had the same problem (different modem) but I had to go buy a new one too.
Nathan
nathanc@[antispam]rmci.net
Ellamenno Pee wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a telepath modem for windows with X2 from Gateway. I was not
>sure if this was a winmodem for sure, or if there was hope. I tried
>using pnpdump and isapnp. After running setserial on the specified
>port, the modem clicks twice and picks up the line. ( kinda weird). I
>tried sending AT commands to it but it does not seem to respond to
>them. I called Gateway to get some additional information, and they
>assured me that none of the modem's functionality is software based. I
>am told that the only thing that would not work is some of the voice
>features (it's a voice/data modem). Now I am thoroughly confused. Any
>information about this would be greatly appreciated. Also, what is the
>difference between the Telepath for Windows with X2 and the Telepath 56k
>if anyone knows?
>
>The Nut
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: James Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,microsoft.public.windowsnt,microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Inaccessible boot device: HELP! (NT Error, Linuxes fault?)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 03:20:17 -0700
CLS wrote:
> stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
>
> > PS - I had a similiar failure (invalid boot device) on another hard drive
> > recently too.
>
> Stuart:
>
> Lilo overwrote the NT boot sector. Use your NT ERD to restore the NT boot
> sector information. Boot from the 3 original NT disks and select repair.
> Repair boot sector only. When using Linux and NT together, my
> recommendation is to employ a third party boot manager program such as
> System Commander, BootMagic, IBM Boot Manager, etc.
Uh I think that when you set up lilo it gives you the option to install it to
other places than mbr. Say like if your Linux boot partition is /dev/sdb1 you
can put lilo there.
jamess
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. P.)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Netgear ISA EA201c NIC
Date: 11 Apr 1999 21:12:18 -0700
On 12 Apr 1999 00:46:19, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Truthfuly, I don't know, but I'd guess that you may need to boot to DOS, and use
>their setup program to initialize the card first...
Thats what I suspected, too, because it sounds from the docs that it has
a flash rom or something.
Unfortunatelly I can't test it for a while because after putting in the
NIC, I could not boot up my PC. Something must have been damaged during
the operation. I'll have to figure out what.
Thanks anyway,
Joe
------------------------------
From: "Groman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.fan.linux,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Video card help... please...
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 21:36:09 -0700
I just installed RedHat Linux 5.2.
And I have trouble configuring my XServer...
I have Matrox Millenium G200 card, which is only supported in XFree86 3.3.3,
and I have 3.3.2
Is there any way to upgrade the video card list, without downloading the
whole 3.3.2 to 3.3.3 patch(which is huge, and there are no instructions on
what to download).
I tried selecting Generic VGA or Unsupported VGA, but it doesn't work.
Thanks in advance...
Groman.
P.S. Please e-mail your answers to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: 2 Ethernet Cards - IRQ/Address Conflict? Help!
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 04:32:47 GMT
Yes, the cards are PCI. They have no jumpers. There doesn't seem to be anyway
of changing the IRQ or base io address with utility programs - I've searched
the web - event the RealTek RSET8029 doesn't do the job. I notice on boot
that the (Award) BIOS reports both network cars on IRQ11.
Surely there must be a way to change the IRQ on the card??
Thanks for help so far, but the solution is yet to be found.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Conrad B Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------08F8AB51773B253B2886862F
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Simon Morley wrote:
>
> > The cards are both RealTek RTL8029 and show now way of changing the IRQ with
> > setup programs.
> > I can change the bas address - but what to & will is that gonna help as the
> > two are already using different addresses?
> > Thanks.
> >
> > pv wrote in message ...
> > >Simon Morley wrote in message <7ep6kl$vvc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >[...]
> > >>Is there anything I can do to fix this other than buying a new card with
> > >>jumpers?
> > >sure there is.. a jumperless card comes with a setup disk
> > >where u can change the base address and irq. No prob..
> > >if u are missing the disk download one from the net!!
> > >it's dos, so have ur dos boot disk handy ;-)
> > >
> > >good luck
> > >pv
> > >
> > >
>
> Are these cards PCI if so check the config of your PCI bus it could be
> assigning the same IRQ to both Cards.
>
> Conrad
>
> --------------08F8AB51773B253B2886862F
> Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
> name="cnelson.vcf"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Description: Card for Conrad B Nelson
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="cnelson.vcf"
>
> begin:vcard
> n:Nelson;Conrad
> tel;work:215.648.2339
> x-mozilla-html:TRUE
> url:http://www.Cognos.com
> org:Cognos Corporation
> version:2.1
> email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> title:Solutions Specialist
> adr;quoted-printable:;;Two Valley Square=0D=0A512 Township Line Road=0D=0ASuite
>125;Blue Bell;PA;19422;
> x-mozilla-cpt:;0
> fn:Conrad Nelson
> end:vcard
>
> --------------08F8AB51773B253B2886862F--
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: <@worldonline.nl>
Subject: SBLive!
Date: 6 Apr 1999 10:35:46 GMT
Hello,
Although there is not a formal driver yet
for the SBLive, I was wondering if anyone among you
has already managed to set up this card under linux
I am especially interested in the multichannel/
spdif I/O options.
On a related note --is it possible to use the spdif
interface, or any other computer port, for that matter--
at a higher sample rate than the customary 44.1/48kHz?
There are numerous interesting high-end audio experiments
that could be done at high sample rates.
Thanks in advance,
Hans Pelleboer
------------------------------
From: Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help configuring hispeed serial card
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 04:57:38 GMT
I have a TurboExpress Port 920. It's configured for ttyS2, port
0x3e8, irq2 (via isapnp). The output of 'setserial -a /dev/ttyS2' is:
/dev/ttyS2, Line 2, UART: 16750, Port: 0x03e8, IRQ: 2
Baud_base: 230400, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000, closing_wait2: infinte
Flags: spd_shi skip_test session_lockout
I'm running Debian 2.1 with kernel 2.2.5, setserial 2.15, and isapnp
1.18. I can connect to my external ISDN modem with 'cu -s9600 -lttyS2'
and, upon entering 'AT<RET>', get back 'OK<RET>'. However, if I
use 'cu -s38400 -lttyS2' and enter 'AT<RET>', it's as if <NL> was
entered (cursor returns to 'A' in 'AT<RET>'). What gives? I can
connect to the external ISDN modem fine at 38.4kb from ttyS1 (COM2).
The commandline to setserial to configure this port is:
setserial -b /dev/ttyS2 irq 9 port 0x3e8 uart 16750 \
baud_base 230400 spd_shi skip_test session_lockout
I added the 'spd_shi' to setserial.c and recompiled so it would
recognize it as an option.
--
albert chin (china (at) thewrittenword (dot) com)
------------------------------
From: Tom Fleischman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help - How to Remove Red Hat ?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 03:27:14 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 4/10/99, 4:41:27 PM, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding =
Re: Help - How to Remove Red Hat ?:
> 7676786876NOSPAMMINGhotmailcom wrote:
> >
> > Could anyone answer a question on how to remove Linux / LILO from
> > the boot sector of a hard drive?
> If Linux is still there, use lilo -U. If it's already gone, use FDISK=
> /MBR to rewrite the master boot record.
Make sure you use your Win9x boot floppy version of FDISK when you do=20
this!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tavin Cole)
Subject: modem setup
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 05:08:43 GMT
I've gathered from searching through Dejanews that everyone is tired of people asking
how to get their modems to work
under linux.. nevertheless I have researched my situation as thoroughly as possible
and am posting here as a last resort:
I have an internal PCI, Plug'n'Play modem that is hardwired to COM5. It is a generic
56k, V.90 modem with a Cirrus Logic
chipset. There are no jumpers for disabling Plug'n'Play or changing the COM port.
However, it is not a Winmodem, or at
least there is absolutely nothing in the (sparse) documentation that says it's a
Winmodem.
I've upgraded to the 2.2.5 kernel with support for more than 4 serial ports on the
dumb serial driver. I've also enabled
Plug'n'Play support.
I've created a ttyS4 device in /dev and used setserial to set the IRQ and I/O address
according to /proc/pci (which seems
to prove that linux is quite aware of the presence of the modem on the PCI bus,
regardless of Plug'n'Play concerns). I made
sure it was a character device with the correct minor number, permissions, etc. so
there should be no problems there.
So far, so good. Now, when I use setserial to set the UART (i've tried 16550a, 16550,
and 16450) I get a peculiar message:
ttyS4: 1 input overrun(s)
Next, I run minicom. It is set to use /dev/ttyS4 through the /dev/modem link. I type
"AT" and get no echo or any response
whatsoever. Then a few seconds later, a string of dots goes across the screen, i.e.
"........" up to the right margin.
So I give up and exit minicom. Then I get the message:
ttyS4: 1 input overrun(s)
followed by:
ttyS4: 256 input overrun(s)
This last one with the 256 repeats itself every few seconds indefinitely, and Ctrl-C
doesn't do a thing. I either have to reboot
or Ctrl-Z.
Okay, so that's my problem. I've been through all the relevant docs I could find and
nothing seems to address this, especially
since most of what's available seems to have been written before the 2.2 kernels that
support COM ports higher than 4. I'm
about to give up and get a new modem, but I thought I'd try here first:
1) If it really IS a Winmodem, despite what the docs say, how can I determine that?
2) Otherwise, what's the deal with these ttyS4: xxx input overrun(s)? What am I doing
wrong?
I would really appreciate any wisdom on this. Thanks.
-t.c.
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
=========== Over 72,000 Groups, Plus Dedicated Binaries Servers ==========
------------------------------
From: d s f o x @ c o g s c i . u c s d . e d u (David Fox)
Subject: Re: laptops and linux
Date: 11 Apr 1999 22:03:03 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Knight) writes:
> do devolopement. So i would need somehting that could handle X Windows,
> handle sound, and graphics. Have a floppy and cdrom, around 64-96MB
> memory. Im thinking a pentium II type processor. Anyway my question is,
> where could i find a nice laptop for around 2,000 - 3,000 dollars, that
> will run linux beutifully? Thanks in advance.
IBM Thinkpad 600 could fit the bill.
--
David Fox http://hci.ucsd.edu/dsf xoF divaD
UCSD HCI Lab baL ICH DSCU
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
