Linux-Hardware Digest #570, Volume #10           Wed, 23 Jun 99 23:13:32 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Compatible Modems for Linux (Andrew Comech)
  Why my Sis620 can only support 8bpp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Overclocking under linux? ("Andrew J. Norman")
  BusLogic device busy (Tom Dye)
  Re: modem connection speed. (Andrew Comech)
  Re: RIVA TNT (Eric Penne)
  Re: Windows easy to install? BULLSHIT!
  Re: Intel Pro 100+ (Eric Penne)
  Re: Looking for vendor for a Linux box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: 360K 5 1/4" drives on linux (Henry Davies)
  Re: SOundblaster PCI128 card (Charles Wilkins)
  Re: [HELP] Urgent : problem with two SCSI controlers..... (second try) (John Munoz)
  anybody seen such sofware? (Denis)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech)
Subject: Re: Compatible Modems for Linux
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Jun 1999 21:25:52 -0500

On Wed, 23 Jun 99 09:28:47 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> >Am wondering if anyone can recommend a not too expensive modem for Linux.
> >I have a WinModem (even though its not officially) that will not work
> >due to hardware controllers. Any help is appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I recommend an external modem.
> I am now using the Etech Bullet E56k (V90 also flex).
> Once you have has status lights for a while, you never want to be without.
> Also, change PC, no need to open up anything, just plug in the serial port.
> Also it has video conferencing, voice mail, and what not.
> (The cdrom that comes with it does not mention Linux however).
> But I plugged it in and it just worked.
> Set your serial port speed to maximum, get a 16550A UART serial card if your
> system is an older one.
> I also use the program irqtune (somewhere on the net), and set hdparm -u 1
> to prevent packet loss.
> Read manual hdparm before you do any of that though.
> Now on a 486 DX 2 66 the maximum download speed I had (downloading .wrl files
> from the NASA site), was 10.5 kilo byte (no spelling mistake) per second (V90,
> 49333 carrier) as reported by Netscape 4.3 on a 1.5 MByte file.
> No packet loss.
> Think I payed about 75 $ for it, Rockwell Chip set, superb.

10-12K/s is a normal speed for transferring ASCII files
(they are compressed like 3:1 by the compression protocol).

AOpen FM56-ITU/2 (ISA K56Flex/V.90, jumpers, no PnP) will give you that 
same rate for just $30, and you could also save a few more cents on a
utility bill!

Best,
a.

-- 
Looking for a Linux-compatible V.90 modem? See
http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~comech/tools/CheapBox.html#modems

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Why my Sis620 can only support 8bpp
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 01:11:14 GMT

Hi, I have a RedHat6.0 system which is on a PII350 box with M748
motherboard, which integrates video card Sis620. I used XFCom_Sis
driver for the card, and set the options in XF86config like this:

...
VideoRam 8192
Option  "no_linear"
Option  "sw_cursor"
Option  "fast_vram"
Option  "pci_burst_on"
...

The X Window displays well, but it can only support 8bpp(256 colors).
The README file of XFCom_Sis said that in no_linear mode, only this
depth is supported, but if I comment out the no_linear line, then the
texts in X will all display as underlines. Anybody knows what's the
reason? And is there a way to get round of this? I am sick of
the "Can't allocate color..." message. Thank you!

Di Yu
6.23


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: "Andrew J. Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overclocking under linux?
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 01:25:44 GMT

John Miller wrote:

> Just a thought...  Since linux is more efficient with system resources,
> and I've heard it works the hardware more than windoze, will an
> overclocked system which is stable in windoze (as stable as anything can
> be at least) be more prone to problems under linux?
>
> -John

You raise a good question.  Believe it or not you are in part correct.
Linux can stress certain components more than Win95/98/NT, but also has
some features which make it more friendly to long term (and stable)
Overclocking.   Fiirst off both Linux and Win/NT will issue idle cycle
commands to the processor which cause it to enter a lower power state.
This is essentially the same as a number of the popular "Software CPU
coolers."  The deal is that when it is in this lower power state it
generates less heat, and thus becomes more "stable" even at the elevated
core frequency (note: this is not the same as some of the utilities that
"throttle" your cpu, nor is it exactly the same as a power management
mode)  At the same time Linux is less forgiving than Windows 95/98/NT and
tends to report any errors it gets that might be caused by the overclocking
procedure (sig11 errors are the most common and talked about, although
there are a number of other signs that the different compents are failing
under the overclocking.....and interesting one was one of the IDE controls
on a cheap motherboard closing various read/write calls prematurely due to
it's inability to cope with division of a 112MHz FSB)

Essentially the two operating systems behave differently.  Linux likes to
scream and shout about the smallest errors......while Win95/98 believes
that ignorance is bliss....Which is better?  Depends on your system's
purpose in life.  For servers and workstations error detection is essential
and even a single dropped bit can throw off a high precision calculation.
For a game machine it would be obnoxious if the OS dumped core each time
Quake lost a bit while calculating the color of that pixel on the end of
your enemy's nose.

Generally the rule of thumb I stick to is that if I can stablize a system
under Linux and by that I mean that I can stress it out with large
compilation task (a good one is repeated kernel recompiles and when I say
repeated I mean 20-30 times without an error.....no joke) Then the system
will ussually be stable under any varient of Windows that I have used.  The
reverse has not been true.

Just as a bit of trivia I'll give you a table of some of the processors
that I tested and the Maxium speeds that they attained under both Linux and
under Win95/98 (WinNT results were similar)

Processor                                        Speed
Multiplier        FSB                Windows*        Linux*
========================================================
Celeron PPGA 300a (dual)         464Mhz    4.5
103Mhz        YES                    YES
Celeron Slot1 300a                        464 Mhz    4.5
103Mhz        YES                    YES
K6-2 266                                         300 Mhz
3.0                    100Mhz        YES                    YES
K6-2 266                                         350Mhz
3.5                    100Mhz        YES                     NO
K6-2 266                                         336Mhz
3.0                    112Mhz         YES                     NO
K6-2 266                                         333Mhz
4.0                    83Mhz            YES                   YES
K6-2 266                                         337Mhz
4.5                    75Mhz            YES                   YES
K6 266                                              333Mhz
4.0                    83Mhz            YES                    YES
K6 266                                              350Mhz
4.0                    100Mhz          YES                     NO
K6 266                                              337Mhz
4.0                    75Mhz            YES                     YES
Cyrix MII (PR300)                        66Mhz      3.5
231Mhz          YES                    YES
Cyrix MII (PR300)                        75Mhz      3.0
225Mhz          YES                    YES
Cyrix MII (PR300)                        83Mhz      3.0
249Mhz          YES                    NO
Cyrix MII (PR300)                        100Mhz    2.5
250Mhz          NO                     NO
Cyrix 6x86 (PR200)                        66Mhz      2.5
166Mhz          YES                    YES
Cyrix 6x86 (PR200)                        75Mhz      2.5
187Mhz          YES                    NO

*Criterion for stability, Windows-> could run WinBench 97 successfully and
play Quake without too much difficulty, Under Linux-> could run NBench
(Bytemark Nativemode Benchmark) and recompile kernel 2.0.36 repeatedly

--
        Andrew J. Norman
        Dept. of Physics
        College of William & Mary
_____________________________________________________________
"I am afeard there are few die well that die in a battle;
 for how can they charitably dispose of any thing,
 when blood is their argument?"  -- Williams
                Henry V--Act 4 Scene 1
_____________________________________________________________




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Dye)
Subject: BusLogic device busy
Date: 24 Jun 1999 02:09:30 GMT

Hello all,

I recently added a BusLogic BT950 scsi adapter and a Yamaha CDRW to my
RedHat 5.1 box.  Everything works fine except ... on cold boot the
buslogic module doesn't load, complaining that a device is busy.  If I
follow this with a warm boot, everything works.

I don't use the CDRW very often, so can live with the boot/reboot routine
when I want to use it.  But, something in me likes to have everything
right all of the time (sigh) and I was wondering if someone might know how
I could make things work on a cold boot.

Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.

Tom

--
Thomas S. Dye, Ph.D.                       http://www.lava.net/~tdye
Home: 813 16th Avenue, Honolulu, Hawaii 96816.  Voice (808) 734-2087.
Work: International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., 2081 Young St.,
      Honolulu, Hawaii 96826. Voice (808) 946-2548; Fax 943-0716.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech)
Subject: Re: modem connection speed.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Jun 1999 21:12:22 -0500

most 56K modems are in fact K56Flex. If it is USR's x2 vs. boss's
K56Flex, then the modems fall back to V.34 protocol. V.34 protocol
is very sensitive to the noise, and even when K56Flex<->K56Flex
would give you around 45000, V.34 modems drop to 26400bps (this
is fairly typical). 

One could measure the noise level: once the modem connects, tell 
it `+++' and then `at%q' (which usually answers with the noise level);
to return -- press `ato'. If the noise level is well above 3 (like
20), then V.34 may be doomed to 26400bps.

Talk you boss into getting a cable modem for him and yourself ;-)

Best,
a.

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:37:12 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An internal server at my company was set up by a past employee.  The
> boss dials into this server (ppp).  The server is a pentium II running
> redhat 5.1.  The modem is an internal sportster at /dev/ttyS2 (ati3:
> "U.S. Robotics Sportster 56000 Voice V4.3.172", ati0: "5601", ati1:
> "11B1").
> 
> The connection speed is too slow for the boss.  He wants to connect at
> 56k. 

No way. Could be at most 53XXX(?) Usually it tops at around 48000.

> I believe it is now connecting at 24k (I haven't connected in with
> ppp, but dialing in (and answering) with minicom, the connect string on
> the server side says CONNECT 24000).

Is it actually DCE rate or DTE rate? add S95=44 to the INIT string
and read off numbers after CARRIER (DCE, carrier's rate) and CONNECT
(DTE, baud rate of the serial port).

> The guy who set the server up originally said he had unsucessfully
> searched the web for a modem driver for it (which struck me as weird,
> since all the modem coding I've done has just involved termios stuff).
> My boss instructed me to search now (a year after the server's
> inception) to see if that driver is available.  I haven't found anything
> on redhat.com or 3com.com on linux sportster driver info.  (I did note
> that the X2 model 1785 sportster was taken off the incompatible harware
> list [appendix E to the hardware compatability HOWTO] -- any
> implications?)

AFAIK, there are no specific "modem drivers" in Linux (and will not
be any until winmodems and other proprietary crap become supported).
 
> The current setup in /etc/rc.d/rc.local is "/bin/setserial /dev/ttyS2
> auto_irq skip_test autoconfig spd_vhi".  After bootup, "stty -a
> </dev/ttyS2" returns that the speed is at 115200 baud.

So 24000 must be DCE modem-to-modem rate...
 
> Anyone know if it is possible to increase this speed?  Is there some
> special driver for this?  Let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> AED
> 
> [Here's the full output of "stty -a </dev/ttyS2", if helpful.]
> # stty -a </dev/ttyS2
> speed 115200 baud; rows 0; columns 0; line = 0;
> intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = <undef>;
> eol2 = <undef>; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R; werase =
> ^W;
> lnext = ^V; flush = ^O; min = 1; time = 0;
> -parenb -parodd cs8 hupcl -cstopb cread clocal crtscts
> -ignbrk -brkint -ignpar -parmrk -inpck -istrip -inlcr -igncr -icrnl
> -ixon
> -ixoff -iuclc -ixany -imaxbel
> -opost -olcuc -ocrnl -onlcr -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel nl0 cr0 tab0
> bs0 vt0
> ff0
> -isig -icanon -iexten -echo -echoe -echok -echonl -noflsh -xcase -tostop
> -echoprt -echoctl -echoke

Jesus F. Crist!..
You should definitely talk your boss into getting cable modems
for the entire company.

-- 
Looking for a Linux-compatible V.90 modem? See
http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~comech/tools/CheapBox.html#modems

------------------------------

From: Eric Penne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RIVA TNT
Date: 24 Jun 1999 01:28:55 GMT


Make sure you have XFree86 3.3.3.1

You can get this and more at www.xfree86.org
including installation instructions for nothing more than
what it costs you to download it.

What a deal!
Eric


Greg Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hi All 
: I am looking for a XFree86 driver for a 
: ASUS Riva TNT AGP-V3400TNT Video Card 
: Can anyone let me know where I can get one
: or which standard one will work and work best


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Windows easy to install? BULLSHIT!
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 18:06:53 -0700

On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:47:03 -0400, Brian Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Martin A. Boegelund" wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>   Brian Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [del]
>>
>> > It's another story if you want a dual-boot between
>> > Linux and Win9x or NT.  (Incidentally, many users dual-boot, just to
>> have access to the
>> > kind of apps, like databases, that Linux doesn't have yet.)
>>
>> You mean games, right?!?
>>
>
>Absolutely not.  Linux runs Quake, Doom, and a host of other games.   If
>you'd bothered to read the post before you flamed it, you would have seen
>the word "databases", clear as day.  Linux has SQL.  By contrast, Windows
>users are used to a host of database front-ends (Paradox, Access,
>FileMaker Pro)  and would be reluctant to give them up to make a complete

        Then say database FRONTEND.

[deletia]
-- 

It helps the car, in terms of end user complexity and engineering,         
that a car is not expected to suddenly become wood chipper at some    |||
arbitrary point as it's rolling down the road.                       / | \
                                                                       
                        Seeking sane PPP Docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com

------------------------------

From: Eric Penne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Intel Pro 100+
Date: 24 Jun 1999 01:33:39 GMT

I use that card with an ABIT BH6 and it set up so nicely with Redhat 6.0
that I haven't taken the time to look at the settings.  Sometimes things
do work right.

Eric

Dan St. Sauveur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Anybody using an Intel Pro 100+ management adapter (10/100 ethernet)?  


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: chi.general,chi.internet
Subject: Re: Looking for vendor for a Linux box
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:14:00 GMT

I agree, I just bought an IndyBox after seeing the
stuff that they donated to Purdue University's
Computer Society.  it's awesome, and was about as
cheap as me putting one together myself.

Kyle E. Wright

In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Renn) wrote:
> On 23 Jun 1999 18:59:54 GMT, Andy Lester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Anywhere in the Chicago NW 'burbs you can point
at?  Or good mail order
> >places?
>
> Have you looked at http://www.indybox.com/ ?
>
> --
> Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
>



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: Henry Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 360K 5 1/4" drives on linux
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:43:20 +0000

B'ichela wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henrik Carlqvist wrote:
> >B'ichela wrote:
> >> I had a 360K in my system as B: in addition to a 1.44MB as A:.
> >> Bios was properly configured as such, linux works the 1.44 with out
> >> a hassle but it Would NOT work the 360K despite the fact that it
> >> recognized it from the system bootup.
> >
> >How did you try to use the drive? Have you tried something like
> >
> >mount /dev/fd1d360 /mnt
> >
> >If you are only using mtools, does b: point to /dev/fd1d360 in
> >/etc/mtools.conf?
> >
> >regards Henrik
> >--
> >spammer strikeback:
> >root@localhost [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         I found part of the problem. My old creaky 5 1/4" half hight drive
> does not have the Disk Change line. It sounds stupid but Linux keeps
> thinkign I took the disks out of the drive. How can I modifiy the kernal
> NOT to look at the floppy disk change line?
>         Is there an option on the lilo boot line to turn checking the
> change line off or do I need to modify the floppy.c routines of the kernal.
> or GASP! find a cheat (hardware wise for this drive.)
>         speaking of the mtools.conf file do you have a known working one?
> aparently my mtools.conf was leftover from when I used the original mtools
> that came with slackware 3.1 and that had less configuration settings in
> it.

I have an old 5 1/4" drive (720K) which Linux claims has a broken DCL. 
I added the following to my rc.local (RH5.2) and it appears to work fine
now.  Unfortunately I forgot where I got the floppycontrol program :(

#
# The 5 1/4 floppy drive which is mounted here seems to have a broken
# disk-change-line.  If we tell the floppy driver about the problem
# then it seems to work fine.
#
/usr/bin/floppycontrol -d /dev/fd1 --broken_dcl


--
Hope that this helps.

henry


> --
>                 A pearl of wisdom from the y2K newsgroups:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Y2K appears to be the Baby Boomers mid-life crisis, and it has the
> potential to be a dandy.
>                         -- Anonymnous --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                         B'ichela

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charles Wilkins)
Subject: Re: SOundblaster PCI128 card
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:46:29 GMT

On Mon, 01 Mar 1999 14:33:14 -0500, Jose Urena
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>you are using the wrong driver.
>( you might have to activate prompting for new drivers)
>You need to use the Ensoniqs 1370 or Soundblaster 1370, or maybe it is
>the 1371
>no other sound card needs to be selected
>do not configure any of the io/dma/IRQ that you'll see farther down in
>the sound card list. they are not used by the PC128
>BTW, somepeople, like me, have not got MIDI sounds to play. try playing
>other files, wave maybe.
>
>"Venkatesh S. Rao" wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I am trying to get a SB PCI 128 sound card to work with my RedHat 5.2
>> distribution.
>>
>> 1. Have any of you succeeded at this, or am I wasting my time trying?
>>
>> 2. The /proc/pci recognizes the card as an Ensoniq AudioPCI, and the
>> es1370 dirver recognizes it, but at boot up, it says "soundscape card
>> not found" in the Sound Initialization phase.
>>
>> Any thought/comment appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Venky
>>
>> Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sed s/nospam.//
I can't get midi to work either.
Has anybody else been able to get the ES1370 SoundBlaster PCI 128 to
do midi's ?

Charles Wilkins  CNE / MCP / A+
Network Design Consultant
Practical Computer Solutions
http://www.pcscs.com
609-321-1530
609-321-0840 - fax
--


------------------------------

From: John Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions,linux
Subject: Re: [HELP] Urgent : problem with two SCSI controlers..... (second try)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 19:41:34 -0600

Frank Meisschaert wrote:
> 
> Michel Applaincourt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : How can I have the 2 controlers, 14 readers working well? have i to
> : upgrade kernel to 2.2 as some people said to me ?
> : Have I to give some directive at boot time (for example MAX_LUN?)?
> 
> First solution: Step over to FreeBSD. There can be as many busses/devices as
> you like. Using the CAM system, devices are created on the fly or can be
> wired down. (So your cd devices would be known as cd0 - cd13)
> 
> Second solution: Step over to kernel version 2.2.X.
> (Although I'm not sure if every card module can support more than one card)
> 

Snipped and modified from previous unanswered post:
> Frank
> > So my question is :
> >
> > How can I have the 2 controlers, 14 readers working well? have i to
> > upgrade kernel to 2.2 as some people said to me ?

I have copied this message forward to this branch of the thread.  Im
using 2.2.5 Kernel and am getting weird effects on trying to use the 9th
device make with mknod.  Any ideas?

I have a similar problem.  I've followed this thread, read the
scsi-howto and scsi-programming-howto, to no avail.  I have 9 scsi
drives, 3 are scsi II (with ids 1-3) and 6 uw scsi drives.  id0 is uw,
and id's 8-12 are uw also. I also have narrow devices at 5 and 6 (cd and
tape).  in /dev/ there are 8 devices, so I make a /dev/sdi device.  

There is a big difference between what dmesg shows and what fdisk or
cfdisk show!  the mknod /dev/sdi 8 144 command seems to create a device
that loops around, re-using sdd or something. I have no need for 10
logical partitions.  Is there any way to make each device use less than
16 of the precious major minor bits so that I can have more than 8
devices (16 addresses x 8 devices = 128 ).  What I want is 8 addresses x
16 devices).  Anyone know how to make this work?  I tried hacking
MAKEDEV, but screwed things up pretty well.

Ive set all drives on second channel to 20 mbps.  When I boot, I see
this:
(its looks good here...)
dmesg shows:
scsi0 : BusLogic BT-952
scsi1 : BusLogic BT-952
scsi : 2 hosts.
  Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST32171W          Rev: 0338
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
  Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST32550W SUN2.1G  Rev: 0418
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0
  Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST32550W SUN2.1G  Rev: 0418
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdc at scsi0, channel 0, id 2, lun 0
  Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST32550W SUN2.1G  Rev: 0418
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdd at scsi0, channel 0, id 3, lun 0
  Vendor: COMPAQ    Model: CD-ROM CR-503BCQ  Rev: 1.1c
  Type:   CD-ROM                             ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 5, lun 0
  Vendor: ARCHIVE   Model: Python 25501-XXX  Rev: 5.72
  Type:   Sequential-Access                  ANSI SCSI revision: 02
  Vendor: HITACHI   Model: DK319H-18WC       Rev: AKAJ
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sde at scsi1, channel 0, id 8, lun 0
  Vendor: HITACHI   Model: DK319H-18WC       Rev: AKAJ
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdf at scsi1, channel 0, id 9, lun 0
  Vendor: HITACHI   Model: DK319H-18WC       Rev: AKAJ
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdg at scsi1, channel 0, id 10, lun 0
  Vendor: HITACHI   Model: DK319H-18WC       Rev: AKAJ
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdh at scsi1, channel 0, id 11, lun 0
  Vendor: HITACHI   Model: DK319H-18WC       Rev: AKAJ
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Detected scsi disk sdi at scsi1, channel 0, id 12, lun 0
scsi0: Target 0: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 40.0 MB/sec, offset
15
scsi0: Target 1: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec, offset
15
scsi0: Target 2: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec, offset
15
scsi0: Target 3: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec, offset
15
scsi0: Target 5: Queue Depth 3, Asynchronous
scsi0: Target 6: Queue Depth 3, Synchronous at 6.67 MB/sec, offset 15
scsi1: Target 8: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec, offset
15
scsi1: Target 9: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec, offset
15
scsi1: Target 10: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec,
offset 15
scsi1: Target 11: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec,
offset 15
scsi1: Target 12: Queue Depth 28, Wide Synchronous at 20.0 MB/sec,
offset 15

SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 4222640 [2061 MB] [2.1
GB]
 sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
SCSI device sdb: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 4194995 [2048 MB] [2.0
GB]
 sdb: sdb1
SCSI device sdc: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 4194995 [2048 MB] [2.0
GB]
 sdc: sdc1
SCSI device sdd: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 4194995 [2048 MB] [2.0
GB]
 sdd: sdd1
SCSI device sde: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 35970860 [17563 MB]
[17.6 GB]
 sde: sde1 sde2
SCSI device sdf: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 35970860 [17563 MB]
[17.6 GB]
 sdf: sdf1 sdf2
SCSI device sdg: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 35970860 [17563 MB]
[17.6 GB]
 sdg: sdg1 sdg2
SCSI device sdh: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 35970860 [17563 MB]
[17.6 GB]
 sdh: sdh1 sdh2 sdh3 sdh4
SCSI device sdi: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 35970860 [17563 MB]
[17.6 GB]
 sdi: sdi1 sdi2 sdi3 sdi4

 if i do a fdisk -l sd[a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i] > file.txt, its all messed up
/out of synch with what dmesg reports.  Note letter gaps, and especially
the sde and sdg devices are not the same size as the sde and sdg device
in dmesg.  There should be 9 consecutive drive letters, instead i see:

Disk /dev/sda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 262 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1             1       90   722893+  83  Linux native
/dev/sda2            91      106   128520   82  Linux swap
/dev/sda3           107      196   722925   83  Linux native
/dev/sda4           197      262   530145   83  Linux native

Disk /dev/sdc: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 261 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdc1             1      261  2096451    6  DOS 16-bit >=32M

Disk /dev/sde: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 261 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sde1             1      261  2096451    6  DOS 16-bit >=32M

Disk /dev/sdg: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 261 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdg1             1      261  2096451   83  Linux native

Disk /dev/sdh: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2239 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdh1             1      574  4610623+  83  Linux native
/dev/sdh2           575     1148  4610655   83  Linux native
/dev/sdh3          1149     1722  4610655   83  Linux native
/dev/sdh4          1723     2239  4152802+  83  Linux native

Disk /dev/sdi: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2239 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdi1             1      574  4610623+  83  Linux native
/dev/sdi2           575     1148  4610655   83  Linux native
/dev/sdi3          1149     1722  4610655   83  Linux native
/dev/sdi4          1723     2239  4152802+  83  Linux native

A direct reply to my address would be greatly appreciated... May miss
the post replies.  Thanks...

------------------------------

From: Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: anybody seen such sofware?
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:59:51 -0400

Hi, I'm looking for software that helps 
planning, tracking, and analyzing workouts (such as for triathlon) under
linux. I know there are such things for Windows. (i.e RunLog.) Anybody
seen something like that? I would really apreciate if you can let me
know about it.
thanks a lot.
denis

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to