Linux-Hardware Digest #14, Volume #14 Mon, 11 Dec 00 14:13:05 EST
Contents:
Kernel sees only part of memory (Peter Linde)
Driver for Adaptec ARO-1130U2 ("TeleDK")
HELP!!! drivers for winmodem .... ("Johny")
Re: I815 can not work under kernel 2.2.16 and XFree86 4.0.1 (J Wendel)
Re: Kernel sees only part of memory (Mathias Meisfjordskar)
Re: Recognizing multiple CPUs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: NIC identification ("Alk")
SAG Electronics as a Hardware Vendor (Howard Arons)
Booting a RAID system ("Pedro")
Re: Asus A7V and IBM Deskstart 75GXP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: LILO-Problem after adding a HD ("Alk")
Re: adaptec 2940uw and install ("Alk")
Re: No sound after 2.4.0-test10 kernel build ("Eric Wertman")
Re: What is the command to . . . ? (Kaz Kylheku)
ABit; HPT366; Linux 7 Install problems ("DjM")
Re: modem driver (-J=P-)
Re: Abit KT6-RAID & linux ("DjM")
Dell Inspiron 8000 & Suse Linux 7.0 ("Holger")
Re: modem driver ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: modem driver ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: Kernel sees only part of memory
Re: Linux with Abit KT7 & AMD Duron ("DjM")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Peter Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Kernel sees only part of memory
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:09:03 +0100
Dear all,
I am running RH Linux 7.0 on an HP Kayak, which has
2x733 Mhz processors and 256 Mb of memory. I also run Windows 2000
from a separate disk. While booting Linux, the kernel reports and uses
only 64 Mb of
memory. Under Windows the entire memory is seen and used.
Any hints?
Peter Linde
Lund Observatory
Sweden
------------------------------
From: "TeleDK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Driver for Adaptec ARO-1130U2
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:48:39 +0100
Hi
Does anyone know where to get one, or how to make one?
Does anyone from Adaptec read this?
Best regards
Tue
------------------------------
From: "Johny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP!!! drivers for winmodem ....
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:56:34 +0100
I have a winmodem zoltrix spirit and i need drivers for him... for kernel
2.2.18 plese help me somebody!!!!!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J Wendel)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: I815 can not work under kernel 2.2.16 and XFree86 4.0.1
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:59:20 GMT
815 support is in the latest 2.4.0-test kernels, may also be in
2.2.18.
John
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:27:42 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Max Lungarella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> > I install linux on I815 system. The kernel is 2.2.16 which include
------------------------------
From: Mathias Meisfjordskar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel sees only part of memory
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:57:46 +0100
Peter Linde wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am running RH Linux 7.0 on an HP Kayak, which has
> 2x733 Mhz processors and 256 Mb of memory. I also run Windows 2000
> from a separate disk. While booting Linux, the kernel reports and uses
> only 64 Mb of
> memory. Under Windows the entire memory is seen and used.
>
> Any hints?
Try adding:
append="mem=256M"
in the kernel section "image=..." in /etc/lilo.conf. If that fails, try
255M, and so on.
Mathias
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recognizing multiple CPUs
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:40:37 GMT
In comp.os.linux.questions ekk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe he should wait on RH 7.0, and settle for 6.1 since GCC is not
> adequate in 7.0 . . .
"Adequate for what?" being the operative question. Any program is
inadequate for something.
>> You will want to install Red Hat 7.0, and then upgrade
>> to the 2.4 kernel whan it comes out (probably by the
>> end of the year) to get max performance.
test10 or some other snapshot is in the preview directory, along with
a copy of glibc optimised for 2.4. Personally, I'm waiting for 2.4.0
before even contemplating a move though.
--
Matt Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NIC identification
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:10:54 +0200
Reply-To: "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Eggert Ehmke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:16:06 +0200, "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Are you absolutely sure it has no label with MAC address (12 numbers) or
FCC
> >ID on it? Any of these numbers will surely help you identify board
> >manufacturer, which can give you a further identification tips
>
> Now I found out it is a Accton EN1660 card. According to the SuSE and
> RedHat hardware lists, it should be a PCI card, but in fact it's an
> ISA. Still can't get it to work.
http://www.accton.com/accton/products/adapters/en1660tct/base.html
Yeah, whatever you say - set jumpers an PnP exclusions for your card
accordingly
AG
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Howard Arons)
Subject: SAG Electronics as a Hardware Vendor
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:18:14 -0000
Anyone had dealings with this vendor. I'm looking at their 133FSB box,
configured as follows:
Pentium III 800MHZ/133 w/256k cache
ASUS VIA Apollo Pro 133 A Chipset
(6)PCI 32-bit , (1) ISA, USB, Ultra DMA/66,
AGP 4X
4x DIMM up to 4GB, 133 MHz
128MB SDRAM, ECC 133MHz
30GB, IDE 7200 RPM, Ultra 100 IBM (QTY 1)
3.5" Floppy, Sony
24/48x IDE Sony CDROM
16MB AGP 4X Millenium G400 - Matrox
10/100 PCI Ethernet RJ45, 3COM 3C905-TX
(QTY 1)
PCI-512 Soundblaster, Creative Labs
3D 25 Watt Surround Speakers
Tool Free Mid-Tower
104 Keyboard
3 Button Mouse, Logitech
17 inch Color, .23, 1280x1024, Hitachi
CM-615U
I'd especially like comments on the Asus VIA Apollo pro mobo in this box.
TIA,
Howard A
--
Powered by SuSE Linux 6.3 -- Kernel 2.2.17
News Reader slrn 0.9.5.7
------------------------------
From: "Pedro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Booting a RAID system
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:29:12 -0000
Hi all,
Do a Linux system with the hardware RAID option Adaptec SCSI RAID 2100S and
3 U160 SCSI disk drives in RAID5 need a separate disk out of the RAID system
in order to boot? Or may the system boot with the RAID system?
Thanks.
Pedro
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.periphs.mainboards.asus,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt
Subject: Re: Asus A7V and IBM Deskstart 75GXP
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:34:08 GMT
Neal...
I'm using an Asus A7v rev 1.02 with the 1005.03e BETA BIOS, TBird850
@1000, and have a 46 Gig IBM 75GXP as my primary drive and a 10 Gig
IBM 14GXP as my slave on the ATA100 channel, and I'm using WinME.
I haven't heard any noises or noticed any weird problems with the
drives. I'm new to Asus (ex-ABIT), and I haven't quite figured out
how the power management features really work. It seems to take about
5 seconds to awaken the HDD when I've left the machine for an hour or
so and then move the mouse. This bios is not perfect, but Asus has a
very solid reputation and I think like any other new board, it's never
100% right out of the box.
Mike
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:13:43 GMT, "Neal Lippman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've seen a few posts going by that indicate that the IBM Deskstar 75GXP
>drives do not work (well, or according to some posts, at all) with the ASUS
>A7V mainboard. The posts haven't indicated if that problem is only on the
>Promise Ultra-ATA 100 controller on the mainboard, or also with the standard
>ATA-66 controller as well. Although the last post was in a Linux-related
>newsgroup, the implication was that this was a hardware problem and not OS
>related.
>
>Since I was planning to use an A7V with a 30GB Deskstar for the system I am
>now ordering components for, this is obviously troubling. Anyone have any
>info on this? Is it a Linux specific issue or a hardware issue, or just a
>few folks with random problems? For what it's worth, I'll be running Linux
>Mandrake 7.2 on this system.
>
>Neal
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LILO-Problem after adding a HD
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:36:11 +0200
Reply-To: "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(a)Remove boot detection of HDDs which doesn't contain / or /boot or
wherever boot image or lilo is,
(b)disabling UDMA detection in BIOS sometimes helps with some broken BIOSes
AG
"Stefan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey guys,
>
> I have a running dual-boot box. Windoze 98 on hda1, hda2 and hdb for
> some Linux-"folders". SuSe Linux 7.0 is on sda1.
> My CD-Rom is the hdd.
>
> Now I would like a Samsung 6 GB drive to the system. (Secondary Master).
>
> But whenever I try to connect it into the system LILO fails to start
> ("LI"). When I unplug the drive everything work fine.
> /etc/fstab doesnīt contain the hdd (but that shouldnīt matter for LILO
> (?))
> I tried to reinstall LILO to solve the problem, I changed the HDīs but
> to no avail.
> I would be glad if someone could point me into the right direction.
> (The SuSE-manual and the manualpages didnīt help me much)
> If you need more specific information, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stefan
>
------------------------------
From: "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: adaptec 2940uw and install
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:43:08 +0200
Reply-To: "Alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Check if Ctrl-A settings are completely same in means of exact ( not auto)
termination setup and other strange features setup
If you get crc error right after loading boot image from lilo - lilo is
booting different boot image your it was made for
Boot anything else and recreate lilo
AG
"E Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:912qpc$4jp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I replaced an Adaptec 2940uw with another 2940uw and Red Hat 6.2
> started to have problems with the new card. Processes would not stay
> active and when I restarted Linux again I received a CRC error. I
> reinstalled
> Linux and the installation hangs at different places in the install. I
have
> low level formatted my SCSI drive and checked the drive for errors.
> The Adaptec 2940uw works with Windows (NT/95/98) but it is having problems
> in Linux. The card I am having trouble with is running Adaptec BIOS
> 1.34.3. My other Adaptec 2940uw is running OK on this PC and has Adaptec
> BIOS 1.32. I am wondering if there is a problem with versions of the
Adaptec
> 2940uw BIOS and Linux. Any help would be greatly appreciated !
>
> E. Moore
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (remove NOSPAM from email address)
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Eric Wertman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: No sound after 2.4.0-test10 kernel build
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:31:51 -0500
Joseph-
Thanks for the input, but I did download and install the latest version of
modutils i could find before I build the 2.4. kernel (2.3.9 or something
similar). I may try to re-do it and load emu101k support as a module rather
than into the kernel. Thanks
"Joseph C. Kopec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> As others have informed me, you need a version of modutils that is more
> recent than the stock RH6.2 modutils to compile modules on a 2.4.0
> kernel -- I think this is in the README or other notes for the kernel.
> Try searching on www.deja.com/usenet for my postings on the subject and
> responses thereto. Hope this helps.
>
> Eric Wertman wrote:
>
> > Hi all-
> >
> > After a few tries I managed to compile myself a new kernel from the
> > 2.4.0-test10 source. It seems to work fine, I'm not getting any of the
> > unresolved dependencies or other errors I did on my first two or three
> > tries, but I have no sound at all. I have a SBLive card installed, and
I
> > put emu101k support into the kernel. I appears to be detecting the card
> > properly, and loading mixer settings, but I can't get any sound (no
error
> > messages either). Is there something I could have missed in the kernel
> > configuration? BTW I am using red hat 6.2, and the 2.2.14 kernel still
has
> > perfect sound. Any help is greatly apprecieated. Thanks!
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.mandrake,alt.os.linux.slackware,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: What is the command to . . . ?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:58:50 GMT
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 08:15:34 +0100, Josef Moellers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Allen Wong wrote:
>>
>> In alt.os.linux.slackware Markus Amersdorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> > find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep "Hello World" {} \;
>>
>> This works, but it's alot slower than "find . -type f -name '*.txt' -print |
>> xargs grep "Hello World".
>
>These solutions won't tell where they found the match.
>Markus' solution can be enhanced to do that:
> find . -name '*.txt' -exec grep "Hello World" {} \; -print
So can the other one:
... xargs grep --with-filename "Hello World"
or, more portably:
... xargs grep /dev/null "Hello World"
Note that exec'ing grep for each file may be a lot slower compared to using
xargs to build up a long argument list to pass to one grep instance.
------------------------------
From: "DjM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ABit; HPT366; Linux 7 Install problems
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:33:01 GMT
Teckies:
I am a Unix application developer who is in the process of setting up a pair
of Linux networks (Prod/Dev). I have built a number of PIII machines
employing ABit bords that contain the infamous HPT366 controller (IDE;
DMA66/33).
I have tried a number of times to install Linux (3 different versions- 5.0,
6.2, 7; Gentus Linux that comes with the board). All of the installations
point at the controller (in my mind). Here's what I get after selecting the
installation type (i.e. workstation, server, etc...):
No Drives Found
An Error has occurred - no valid devices were found on which to create new
file systems. Please check your harware for the cause of this problem.
If ayone has run into this on their ABit board and/or know how to fix this,
it would greatly appreciated! I have quite ABit of setting up to do and
obviously can't get to first base, until I get Linux installed. I suspect
that I'll have to pass the kernel something, but I am still researching
this. I have spent the past 2 days trying to work through this. Any
clue-ins would be appreciated.
Thanks,
DjM
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (-J=P-)
Subject: Re: modem driver
Date: 11 Dec 2000 12:36:11 -0600
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:44:55 GMT, Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-J=P- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:04:56 GMT, Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>James Richard Tyrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Dances With Crows wrote:
>>>> I do not understand why we continue to tell people that they need to buy an
>>>> external modem.
>>>
>>>What's your problem with understanding? 99% of PCI modems are
>>>winmodems. 5% of those have a linux driver.
>>>
>>>> I have a 3Com/USR PCI modem -- model 3CP2976 -- and it works fine.
>>>
>>>Bully for you. How does that affect the advice one should give to
>>>people? Or do you propose crossing the road with your eyes shut simply
>>>because 5% of the time you will survive?
>
>> Perhaps because if you over-simplify and say no PCI modems work and someone
>> hears elsewhere that in fact they (some) do work then they will be very confused
>> and may totally disregard your statement?
>
>And what exactly is the penalty of that? They then have a 50% chance
>(confused person) of going ahead and buying the non-working pci
>winmodem, instead of the 95% chance which they'd have had if they went
>ahead and bought a pci modem in the first place without receiving
>advice, or the 0% chance that they'd have if they heeded advice to not
>buy a pci (or USB!) modem.
>
>Do you know ANY game theory, decsion theory, risk analysis? NNNO.
>
>Telling them not to buy a pci modem is the optimal strategy against
>the game countermoves you proposed.
>
>And I suppose they aren't confused by being told that pci modems can work?
>
To use a real-world analogy (like your fatuous road-crossing one) you would
only buy a BMW-compatible exhaust for your BMW car. You only buy a PCI modem
"certified" with linux (such as actiontec call-waiting) for your Linux
system. I would hope most people understand that.
jp
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: "DjM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Abit KT6-RAID & linux
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:37:11 GMT
Dude,
What did you do to get Linux installed on your ABit? I have 6 ABit machines
to install Linux on and can't get through the installation. I suspect that
the HPT366 controller requires some special attention (as it usually does).
Did you have to pass the kernel a directive or two?
FYI: I'll also be setting up on a few HPT370's, too.
Thanks,
DjM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:90lfs0$5jj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a bit of a problem here.
> My system configuration:
> - ABIT KT7 RAID
> - 1 IBM Deskstar 75GXP 30 GB harddrive connected
> to the HPT controller, this is the bootdisk.
> - 2 cdroms connected to IDE1
> - Sklackware 7.1 with kernel 2.4.0-test11
> The system boots up until it has detected the
> cdrom on "hda" and then it hangs, the disk LED
> stays on.
> Weird this is that when i boot a 2.2.16 kernel
> with the hpt370 patch, everything works fine.
>
> anyone got an idea?
>
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>
------------------------------
From: "Holger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dell Inspiron 8000 & Suse Linux 7.0
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:29:55 +0100
Hi
got problems with PCMCIA on an Dell Inspiron 8000 with SUSE LINUX 7.0
When starting - at initialization of PCMCIA
the system hangs
I used PCMCIA_PCIC_OPTS="irq_list=3.5.7.9.10.11"
It had no effect
Works only with
START_PCMCIA="no"
but then the integrated network-adpater is not available :-(
Got tips ????
Thx Holger
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem driver
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:54:28 GMT
James Richard Tyrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And I suppose they aren't confused by being told that pci modems can work?
> Simple: Tell them to buy only PCI modems that say they support Linux on the box, buy
Sigh .. you really are trying, aren't you?
> only a 3Com/USR modem with that model number, buy only form a mail order retailer
The model numbers on 3coms aren't externally visible (or at least not
correlated with the markings on the box), as far as I can gather. I'd
vouch for that on USR equipment, anyway!
> that clearly labels modems as Win or Non-Win, or (as I did) go into a real
Nobody labels their modems as "non-winmodem". They couldn't. The
name is trademarked, and the trademark holders wouldn't do it!
> electronics store and tell the clerk that you need a hardware modem for UNIX.
And how does the person spot a real electronics store, and maybe a real
electronics clerk? I used to know a few about 10 years ago, but I don't
think I could even come up with one nowadays. And the real people don't
know either .. nobody can. Teh manufacturers change things every week
without telling anyone.
> On the other hand you can tell them to waste $50 so they don't have to think!!
Peter
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem driver
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:54:39 GMT
-J=P- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:44:55 GMT, Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To use a real-world analogy (like your fatuous road-crossing one) you would
> only buy a BMW-compatible exhaust for your BMW car. You only buy a PCI modem
> "certified" with linux (such as actiontec call-waiting) for your Linux
This doesn't get you anything. Presumably lucent "certify" their
win/softmodems for linux, since they provided a driver. Unfortunately
their driver won't work on any current distro, since it's compiled for
an old kernel, and available binary-only. (as far as I remember ..)
> system. I would hope most people understand that.
You really, really, are very, very trying, very very hard...
Peter
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Kernel sees only part of memory
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:55:48 -0500
Usually, specifying the amount of memory at boot time should fix it.
However, I must tell you that when I increased my computer's memory from 64
Mb to 128 Mb a while back, the kernel detected all of it.
I seem to recall something about finicky bioses, for which the work around
was to tell the kernel howmuch memory you have, at boot time.
This is done by typing the following at boot time.
linux mem=256M
| |
| ----------- This is a boot time parameter. Lilo passes this
verbatim to the kernel.
|
-------------------- This is the name of the kernel image ( You may
have another kernel image file )
To see what all are the bootables, hit TAB at the LILO prompt.
HTH
Peter Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear all,
>
> I am running RH Linux 7.0 on an HP Kayak, which has
> 2x733 Mhz processors and 256 Mb of memory. I also run Windows 2000
> from a separate disk. While booting Linux, the kernel reports and uses
> only 64 Mb of
> memory. Under Windows the entire memory is seen and used.
>
> Any hints?
>
> Peter Linde
> Lund Observatory
> Sweden
>
------------------------------
From: "DjM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux with Abit KT7 & AMD Duron
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:00:23 GMT
Dudey,
The bottom line is this when you purchase an ABit (I have 6 of them- BX133,
BE6, BF6 SAR6): you are saddled with the Highpoint controller! If you can
get a machine with a Promise controller, you're much better off.
I have just found out that I have to build my own kernel with an IDE patch
as any version (vendor, or version #) will not see the Highpoint controller
(usually HPT366, HPT370).
I've already purchased Redhat 7 and cannot use their installation CD-
wonderful.
I hope this helps...DjM
"Joachim Backhaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I want to build a system with an AMD Duron processor
> & an Abit KT 7 motherboard running under linux.
>
> Does anyone has some experience wether the Abit KT 7 works under linux?
>
> thanx in advance
> joe
>
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.hardware.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
