On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:04:20 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:28 AM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 14:17:55 +0800 Cindy Lu wrote: > > > > Subject: [PATCH RESEND] netvsc: transfer lower device max tso size > > > > > > You say RESEND but I don't see a link to previous posting anywhere. > > Someone should respond to this part, please. > Hi Jakub, sorry for the confusion. I previously sent this mail (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250718060615.237986-1-l...@redhat.com/) to the wrong mailing list, so I'm resended it here. I've also submitted a v2 of this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250718082909.243488-1-l...@redhat.com/ Sorry again for the mix-up. thanks
cindy > > > I'd rather we didn't extend the magic behavior of hyperv/netvsc any > > > further. > > > > Are you referring to the netdev coupling model of the VF acceleration? > > Yes, it tries to apply whole bunch of policy automatically in > the kernel. > > > > We have enough problems with it. > > > > But this fixes a real problem, otherwise nested VM performance will be > > broken due to the GSO software segmentation. > > Perhaps, possibly, a migration plan can be devised, away from the > netvsc model, so we don't have to deal with nuggets of joy like: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1752870014-28909-1-git-send-email-haiya...@linux.microsoft.com/ >
