Hi Jakub, On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:05 PM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:00:47 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > > > But this fixes a real problem, otherwise nested VM performance will be > > > > broken due to the GSO software segmentation. > > > > > > Perhaps, possibly, a migration plan can be devised, away from the > > > netvsc model, so we don't have to deal with nuggets of joy like: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1752870014-28909-1-git-send-email-haiya...@linux.microsoft.com/ > > > > Btw, if I understand this correctly. This is for future development so > > it's not a blocker for this patch? > > Not a blocker, I'm just giving an example of the netvsc auto-weirdness > being a source of tech debt and bugs. Commit d7501e076d859d is another > recent one off the top of my head. IIUC systemd-networkd is broadly > deployed now. It'd be great if there was some migration plan for moving > this sort of VM auto-bonding to user space (with the use of the common > bonding driver, not each hypervisor rolling its own). >
Please let me know if you want to merge this patch or not. If not, how to proceed. Thanks
