On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:07:27 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > > Btw, if I understand this correctly. This is for future development so > > > it's not a blocker for this patch? > > > > Not a blocker, I'm just giving an example of the netvsc auto-weirdness > > being a source of tech debt and bugs. Commit d7501e076d859d is another > > recent one off the top of my head. IIUC systemd-networkd is broadly > > deployed now. It'd be great if there was some migration plan for moving > > this sort of VM auto-bonding to user space (with the use of the common > > bonding driver, not each hypervisor rolling its own). > > > > Please let me know if you want to merge this patch or not. If not, how > to proceed.
As is its definitely not getting merged. Please make it look less burdensome or fix it in user space(!!).
