Hello,
Sonasath, Moiz wrote:
From: Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor <[email protected]>
Include wake up events for receiver overflow and transmitter
underflow in OMAP_I2C_WE_REG configuration. Also fix a small
typo.
Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 827da08..34ea9ed 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -92,8 +92,10 @@
#define OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL (1 << 0) /* Arbitration lost int ena */
/* I2C WE wakeup enable register */
-#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 << 14) /* TX drain wakup */
+#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 << 14) /* TX drain wakeup */
#define OMAP_I2C_WE_RDR_WE (1 << 13) /* RX drain wakeup */
+#define OMAP_I2C_WE_ROVR_WE (1 << 11) /* RX overflow wakeup */
+#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XUDF_WE (1 << 10) /* TX underflow wakeup */
These bits are not documented in OMAP3430, they are reserved. How can they be
used?
Hmm, that's a valid point. I will have to check if I can find more info on the
background of this patch.
A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
