-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaro Koskinen Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:52 AM To: Sonasath, Moiz Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] I2C: OMAP: Add missing wakeup events
Hello, Sonasath, Moiz wrote: >> From: Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor <[email protected]> >> >> Include wake up events for receiver overflow and transmitter >> underflow in OMAP_I2C_WE_REG configuration. Also fix a small typo. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Bhaskar Pakaravoor <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c >> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c index 827da08..34ea9ed 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c >> @@ -92,8 +92,10 @@ >> #define OMAP_I2C_STAT_AL (1 << 0) /* Arbitration lost int ena */ >> >> /* I2C WE wakeup enable register */ >> -#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 << 14) /* TX drain wakup */ >> +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XDR_WE (1 << 14) /* TX drain wakeup */ >> #define OMAP_I2C_WE_RDR_WE (1 << 13) /* RX drain wakeup */ >> +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_ROVR_WE (1 << 11) /* RX overflow wakeup */ >> +#define OMAP_I2C_WE_XUDF_WE (1 << 10) /* TX underflow wakeup */ > > These bits are not documented in OMAP3430, they are reserved. How can they be > used? Hmm, that's a valid point. I will have to check if I can find more info on the background of this patch. A. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
