> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
> @@ -461,8 +461,15 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data)
> case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START:
> if (!mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data))
> break;
> - else
> + else {Here you break the coding style... > drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START; > + /* > + * Switch to the standard path, so we finally need to > + * prepare the io that have not been done in > + * mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg > + */ > + mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs); > + } ... but more importantly, NACK. The code is already hard to follow which is the cause for this bug. This snipplet makes the code even harder to read, so it needs some simplification IMO. I'll fire up a counterpatch in a minute to explain what I mean. > /* FALLTHRU */ > case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START: > writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START, > -- > 1.8.1.2 >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
