On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 13/02/2014 21:36, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer,
> > having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just
> > have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where
> > some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes
> > the code much easier to follow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>
> 
> With this one the bug we observed was fixed.

I squashed patches 1+2 (easier handling for stable) and applied to
for-current, thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to