If there are multiple muxes on one bus, then specifying the channel only
is not sufficient for a distinguishable name. We need the actual device,
too.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Belanger <[email protected]>
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Lawnick <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeroen De Wachter <[email protected]>
---

This is probably the least "ABI" breaking solution? RFC for now...

 drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
index 5b482ea32faf..26aa84902ada 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ struct i2c_adapter *i2c_add_mux_adapter(struct i2c_adapter 
*parent,
 
        /* Now fill out new adapter structure */
        snprintf(priv->adap.name, sizeof(priv->adap.name),
-                "i2c-%d-mux (chan_id %d)", i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id);
+                "i2c-%d-mux (chan_id %d) (mux_device %s)",
+                i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id, dev_name(mux_dev));
        priv->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
        priv->adap.algo = &priv->algo;
        priv->adap.algo_data = priv;
-- 
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to