On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:00:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > If there are multiple muxes on one bus, then specifying the channel only > is not sufficient for a distinguishable name. We need the actual device, > too. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> > Cc: Jean Delvare <[email protected]> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> > Cc: Martin Belanger <[email protected]> > Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Lawnick <[email protected]> > Cc: Jeroen De Wachter <[email protected]> > --- > > This is probably the least "ABI" breaking solution? RFC for now... > > drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c > index 5b482ea32faf..26aa84902ada 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c > @@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ struct i2c_adapter *i2c_add_mux_adapter(struct > i2c_adapter *parent, > > /* Now fill out new adapter structure */ > snprintf(priv->adap.name, sizeof(priv->adap.name), > - "i2c-%d-mux (chan_id %d)", i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id); > + "i2c-%d-mux (chan_id %d) (mux_device %s)", > + i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id, dev_name(mux_dev));
This yields pretty long names, longer than the maximum supported length, if the mux is not an i2c adapter (eg i2c-mux-pinctrl). i2c-17-mux (chan_id 5) (mux_device i2c-mux-pinctrl) has 52 characters, and the maximum name length is 48. Maybe just use "mux" instead of "mux_adapter" ? The result still fails for me because the application code doesn't expect to see "(mux...)", but I guess there will always be some problem :-(. I still need to figure out what causes the failure with the other patch. Guenter > priv->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE; > priv->adap.algo = &priv->algo; > priv->adap.algo_data = priv; > -- > 2.1.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
