On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:06:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There is no need to export functions that are used as the callbacks in the
> struct dw_i2c_dev. Otherwise we get the following warnings:
> 
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c:63:5: warning: symbol 
> 'baytrail_i2c_acquire' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c:114:6: warning: symbol 
> 'baytrail_i2c_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> While here, do few indentation fixes, remove i2c_dw_eval_lock_support() from
> functions exported to the modules and redundant assignment of local sem
> variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

Acked-by: David E. Box <[email protected]>

Yep. These remained from original versions of the patch that did use them as
callbacks in struct dw_i2c_dev. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to