> > Shouldn't the latter be a dev_dbg? > > Wolfram, do we agree on this as states in the patch? Maybe you have more > comments, questions?
Yes, it is fine this way. > Otherwise, should I rebase this on top of 4.0-rc1 or you will be okay > with current version? Well, if it needs rebasing, please do. If not, please say so, too :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
