2015-10-21 16:23 GMT+02:00 Peter Korsgaard <pe...@korsgaard.com>:
>>>>>> "Bartosz" == Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com> writes:
>  >> As the serial number is available on a separate i2c address, wouldn't
>  >> it be simpler to handle these as special (read only) device variants and
>  >> instantiate E.G. a 24c64 (for the normal data) and a 24cs64 (for the
>  >> serial)?
>  >>
>  > Hi Peter,
>  > I wanted to respond that this way we would not be protected from
>  > concurrent accesses, but then I saw I didn't actually include any
>  > locks in the serial read function - my bad. It needs to be fixed as
>  > both memory blocks share the same address pointer.
>  > I'll resend the series.
> But we're protected by the i2c bus lock, right? You do a single
> i2c_transfer to read the serial number.

Why the at24->lock then?

Best regards,
Bartosz Golaszewski
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to