> The comment refers to datasheet, not really to the code. And eventual changes 
> to the datasheet
> that's what can make it invalid (though I don't know TI's plans on it). 
> Nevertheless, yes, I
> think, it's better to drop the comment. Should I re-spin the patch with 
> comment removal in it? 

Thanks. Even better would be replacing the comment: can you give a short
explanation why there is now 12MHz and what needs to be considered if
the value is to be changed again?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to