Hi Wolfram,

On 2016-01-05 19:48, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Peter,
>> PS. needs a bunch of testing, I do not have access to all the involved hw
> First of all, thanks for diving into this topic and the huge effort you
> apparently have put into it.

Yeah, I started with dipping just the toes, but now it rather feels like
I'm fully submerged at the deep end...

> It is obviously a quite intrusive series, so it needs careful review.
> TBH, I can't really tell when I have the bandwidth to do that, so I hope
> other people will step up. And yes, it needs serious testing.
> To all: Although I appreciate any review support, I'd think the first
> thing to be done should be a very high level review - is this series
> worth the huge update? Is the path chosen proper? Stuff like this. I'd
> appreciate Acks or Revs for that. Stuff like fixing checkpatch warnings
> and other minor stuff should come later.

Right, I'll hold back on sending updates for trivial stuff until the
big picture stuff has been cleared.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to