On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Joe Harvell wrote: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=111029414823303&w=2 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=111054989026053&w=2 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=111230129320297&w=2
all pretty much the same report (by Joe). > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=111214149529209&w=2 leads to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2247734.html which is somewhat more interesting, though rather fuzzy. there's something about the driver deciding not to handle an interrupt (nobody cared), after which the driver is toast. some claim that this might be dependent on which disk is attached. fundamentally, the problem is to isolate whether the (few) reported problems are due to peculiarities of the reporting machines or not. > > > You need to add a comment about the SATAII TX2/TX4 boards indicating > > > users have experienced data corruption with the sata_promise driver and > > > the SATAII TX4 board. personally, I don't think this kind of warning is warranted. it's like saying that "rm" should have a warning because users have experienced data deletion when mistyping it... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
