Mark Lord wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Mark Lord wrote:
>> ..
>>> Super!  You've done a great job with this stuff, Tejun!
>> Thanks but I can't really say nice things about how sata_sil24's
>> qc_defer() is implemented or how we generally handle command deferring.
>>  We really need the control at the higher level - request_queue group.
>> Oh well... I guess you guys will be talking about it over beer again
>> soon.  :-)
> ..
> You too?

Unfortunately not, overlapping family event && travel budget issues.  :-(

> Another one for those beers, is a way to tell the IOMMU code about
> physical segment limitations -- so we can stop having to allocate
> PRD tables 2X as big as necessary in drivers like sata_mv.

Hmmm... What's the restriction for sata_mv?  The same as BMDMA?  We need
to update the block layer too to get the BMDMA right.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to