Mark Lord wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: >> Mark Lord wrote: >> .. >>> Super! You've done a great job with this stuff, Tejun! >> >> Thanks but I can't really say nice things about how sata_sil24's >> qc_defer() is implemented or how we generally handle command deferring. >> We really need the control at the higher level - request_queue group. >> Oh well... I guess you guys will be talking about it over beer again >> soon. :-) > .. > > You too?
Unfortunately not, overlapping family event && travel budget issues. :-( > Another one for those beers, is a way to tell the IOMMU code about > physical segment limitations -- so we can stop having to allocate > PRD tables 2X as big as necessary in drivers like sata_mv. Hmmm... What's the restriction for sata_mv? The same as BMDMA? We need to update the block layer too to get the BMDMA right. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html