Mark Lord wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Super!  You've done a great job with this stuff, Tejun!

Thanks but I can't really say nice things about how sata_sil24's
qc_defer() is implemented or how we generally handle command deferring.
 We really need the control at the higher level - request_queue group.
Oh well... I guess you guys will be talking about it over beer again
soon.  :-)

You too?

Another one for those beers, is a way to tell the IOMMU code about
physical segment limitations -- so we can stop having to allocate
PRD tables 2X as big as necessary in drivers like sata_mv.

tomo fixed that, just need to merge it...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to