Jeff Garzik wrote:
Nope, not corrupted in transit or on this side. It falls into a
familiar pattern:
* git-am(1) fails
* patch(1) succeeds
* when applying patch, patch(1) drops a .orig turd
..
Okay, I figured it out. There's a 1-line offset difference
between what is used in patch 10, and where stuff actually
is/was in sata_mv.c .
I probably changed an unrelated line and rediff'd an earlier patch
without rediff'ing everything that followed.
Because patch is smart and can handle it.
But since git-am plays dumb (both good and bad), I'll be more careful
about rediffing the entire series next time round.
Meanwhile, no further action required here.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
