On Saturday 02 February 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > Commit: 0948391641918b95d8d96c15089eb5ac156850b3
>
> > PCI: Remove users of pci_enable_device_bars()
> >
> > This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
> > pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
> >
> > The new API fits nicely, except maybe for the QLA case where a bit of
> > code re-organization might be a good idea but I prefer sticking to the
> > simple patch as I don't have hardware to test on.
> >
> > I'll also need some feedback on the cs5520 change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_cs5520.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_cs5520.c
> > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int __devinit cs5520_init_one(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev, const struct pci_devi
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > /* Perform set up for DMA */
> > - if (pci_enable_device_bars(pdev, 1<<2)) {
> > + if (pci_enable_device_io(pdev)) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR DRV_NAME ": unable to configure BAR2.\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/ide/pci/cs5520.c b/drivers/ide/pci/cs5520.c
> > index 6ec00b8..10adc49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ide/pci/cs5520.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/cs5520.c
> > @@ -156,8 +156,14 @@ static int __devinit cs5520_init_one(struct pci_dev
> > *dev, const struct pci_devic
> > ide_setup_pci_noise(dev, d);
> >
> > /* We must not grab the entire device, it has 'ISA' space in its
> > - BARS too and we will freak out other bits of the kernel */
> > - if (pci_enable_device_bars(dev, 1<<2)) {
> > + * BARS too and we will freak out other bits of the kernel
> > + *
> > + * pci_enable_device_bars() is going away. I replaced it with
> > + * IO only enable for now but I'll need confirmation this is
> > + * allright for that device. If not, it will need some kind of
> > + * quirk. --BenH.
> > + */
> > + if (pci_enable_device_io(dev)) {
> > printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Unable to enable 55x0.\n", d->name);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
>
> So... did the feedback mentioned in the commit log ever appear? :)
Since Alan has commented on it:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/422
"5520 in fact is always enabled as it is the host bridge.
pci_enable_device_io will do just fine. The 5520 fun is if you disable it
the system hangs."
I moved on assuming that either submitter or integrator would follow up...
but it seems that it didn't happen. :(
PS Could somebody remove the stale comment from cs5520.c?
Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
