Messages by Thread
-
Re: linux-next: first tree
Jeff Garzik
-
[PATCH 1/2] ide: add CONFIG_IDE_ARCH_OBSOLETE_DEFAULTS
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
[PATCH 2/2] ide: remove CONFIG_IDE_ARCH_OBSOLETE_INIT
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
[RFC-UGLYPATCH] ata: small optimization in linux/libata.h
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 3/3] ata: simplify clock divisor logic in pata_amd.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 1/3] ata: make ata_scsiop_inq_89 static in libata-scsi.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 2/3] ata: fix sparse warning in libata-core.c
Harvey Harrison
-
ST31000340NS (1000G) Capacity equal 33MB issue.
Richard Liu
-
[PATCH] libata: Register for dock events when the drive is inside a dock station
Holger Macht
-
sparse patches for libata
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 02/11] ata: fix sparse warning in sata_promise.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 11/11] ata: fix sparse warnings in pata_legacy.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 10/11] ata: fix sparse warning in pata_acpi.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 09/11] ata: fix sparse warning in pata_marvell.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 08/11] ata: fix sparse warning in pata_jmicron.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 07/11] ata: fix sparse warning in pata_cs5536.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 06/11] ata: sparse fixes for pata_amd.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 05/11] ata: replace macro with static inline in libata.h
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 04/11] ata: fix sparse warnings in sata_mv.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 03/11] ata: fix sparse warning in sata_via.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 01/11] ata: fix sparse warning in ata_piix.c
Harvey Harrison
-
[PATCH 00/11] ide/ppc: remove PPC specific IDE hacks
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
[Bug 9962] New: 2.6.26-git0: IDE oops during boot
bugme-daemon
-
[PATCH] ide-floppy: merge callbacks
Borislav Petkov
-
[PATCH 1/2] sata_mv: use hpriv->base instead of the host->iomap
Saeed Bishara
-
[PATCH 1/2] ide: use generic ATAPI packet command flags in ide-{floppy,tape}
Borislav Petkov
-
[PATCH 1/2] ide: use generic ATAPI packet command flags in ide-{floppy,tape,scsi}
Borislav Petkov
-
sil3114 corruptions (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround)
Bernd Schubert
-
[libata-dev #upstream-fixes] pata_legacy: don't call ata_host_detach() after initialization failure
Tejun Heo
-
[PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo
-
[PATCH 1/5] printk: keep log level on multiline messages
Tejun Heo
-
[PATCH 2/5] printk: implement [v]printk_header()
Tejun Heo
-
[PATCH 3/5] printk: implement merging printk
Tejun Heo
-
[PATCH 4/5] printk: add Documentation/printk.txt
Tejun Heo
-
[PATCH 5/5] libata: make libata use printk_header() and mprintk
Tejun Heo
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Andrew Morton
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Andrew Morton
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Andrew Morton
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Andrew Morton
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Tejun Heo
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Mark Lord
-
Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #3
Mark Lord
-
[PATCH] pata_cs5536.c bugfix
Martin K. Petersen
-
[PATCH] pata_scc.c: add thaw ops
Akira Iguchi
-
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Greg KH
-
pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Alan Cox
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Sergei Shtylyov
-
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Andreas Jaeger
-
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Muli Ben-Yehuda
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Muli Ben-Yehuda
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Muli Ben-Yehuda
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Sam Ravnborg
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
yong xue
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Muli Ben-Yehuda
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Rene Herman
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Rene Herman
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Michael Ellerman
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Rene Herman
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Michael Ellerman
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Rene Herman
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Bill Davidsen
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Matthew Wilcox
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Ken Moffat
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Ken Moffat
-
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Ken Moffat
-
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Dirk GOUDERS
-
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Greg KH
-
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Dirk GOUDERS
-
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Dirk GOUDERS
-
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Greg KH
-
libata/sata_sil24 cache alignment problem?
Mark Mason
-
[RFC PATCH] ide-floppy: use rq->cmd for preparing and sending packet cmds to the drive
Borislav Petkov