Meir Litmanovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can always do "make -j 2". This will probably help you
> do it slightly faster. Good rule - run make -j N+1 where
> N is number of CPU's in your computer.
I don't understand the meaning of that "+1" (unless this is a way to concur
with another CPU-intensive process running simultaneously on the same box -
but then why not just SIGSTOP or renice it for awhile??). And, definitely,
parallelizing kernel make on a machine with only 16MB of RAM installed is a
bad idea anyway, no matter how many CPUs it has.
Regards,
Evgeny
--
____________________________________________________________
/ Evgeny Stambulchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \
/ Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel \ \
| Phone : (972)8-934-3610 == | == FAX : (972)8-934-3491 | |
| URL : http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/~fnevgeny/ | |
| Finger for PGP key >=====================================+ |
|______________________________________________________________|
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
