> Ouch. Beat Avi Blizovski on the head for poor translation. The article in > cnn.com reads a lot different to me than the one in bokertov. The > differences are subtle, but significant. It's not MS creating its own Linux > or even having its own free software initiative. It's MS trying to defend > itself against the (very real) competition, and using the same old FUD.
And this is what I got from Stephen Shanklands at C|Net: --- From: Stephen Shankland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hmmm. I haven't heard it, but then I just got back from three weeks on vacation. It strikes me as unlikely that Microsoft would "support" Linux, though they might support some bits and pieces of it in some way. "Support" is a very vague term. Sell? Interoperate with? Develop? Advocate? Sell some software for it such as IIS or Active Directory? --- Hetz ================================================================To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
