Here's alan answer...

Hetz

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: linux 2.4.20-pre?-ac? kernels
Date: Friday 27 September 2002 01:02
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> From: Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

TINC

>    The importance of NFS performance and stability over the GigE to the
> Netapp is of course crucial, and so is the VM, for handling the load, the
> many processes running, and proper handling of high speed networking.

The -ac2 and Red Hat VM are basically identical to answer that bit,
both have the O(1) scheduler and both have similar but not identical
NFS code. The 2.4.20pre has some better NFS code but still with glitches
we are hunting down so thats not ideal

> There are also other problems with xinetd's robustness and other issues
> that required tuning, including tcp stack tuning for ADSL users and other
> issues.

I'd be interested in more info on these - either to the list or to me
directly.

<the list is redhat testers list - hetz>


================================================================To unsubscribe, send 
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to