On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:02:07PM +0200, Michael Stolovitzsky wrote: > On Saturday 30 November 2002 08:41, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 08:36:20PM +0000, Diego Iastrubni wrote: > > > Hello linuxers > > > > > > I have uploaded to iglu, my third round of kernel rpms. Tease are 2.4.19 > > > kernel rpms patched with lowlatency patch, preemtible kernel and > > > supermount. > > > > I'm curious, what kind of testing are you giving these kernels? > > Given the reputation of .19 and especially lowlatency and preempt on it, I > doubt any kind of testing would help it.
Errrr... what reputation would that be? care to point at some bug reports? Note that while I have no idea what Diego's kernel rpms contain, calling them "2.4.19" does injustice to the real 2.4.19. So which kernel is giving you headaches? > .19 gives me a variety of headaches, ranging from hanging up IPv6 module to > broken frame diverter, ppp drivers failing to initialize, arts and kdeinit > leaking like hell and such. arts and kdeinit have nothing to do with the kernel. which IPv6 module is hanging up? what is a frame diverter? which ppp drivers are failing to initialize? Did you report all of those problems to the proper place? (which would depend on which kernel exactly you're running). > I would -especially- NOT install it from RPMs, needless to say patched up. > Then again, The Light Of Debian relieves me from this unhappy deed. What have you got against RPMized kernels? Please, be specific. -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sctrace strace /bin/foo http://syscalltrack.sf.net/ Quis custodes ipsos custodiet? ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
