> Can you see something wrong with my posts? I haven't recieved my own > post back but I am recieving every other mail on the list, and > you've cc'd your reply to me for some reason (and I have recieved 2 > copies of it). I only subscribed yesterday and this was my first > post so I may be missing something...
I'm using Open WebMail from work now, and this mail goes to you directly and Linux-IL, so you should receive it twice. > > I really don't think that what Michael wants. Bochs is SLOWER then pentium > > 100Mhz! (it emulates everything - including the processor!) > > Well, he did say he didn't need performance as such and that he'd > have used vmware if it wasn't so expensive. And boch's speed is a > function of your host computer, obviously. It is good for some > purposes, in some situations. Perhaps not in his. But I used it to > play with different distros at one point and it was tolerable > (barely). The new 2.0 tree is supposed to be fast enough to run > windows apps tolerably (once it's started up anyway). It's 50 times slower then your native machine speed (thats according to the main bochs developer, based on the CVS version). > I looked it up, http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/plex86/ and it > looked revived. I only glanced at it though. Now I've looked at it > more throughly and realized you're right, all the activity there was > support & the porting to bochs that you mentioned. > http://mail.nongnu.org/archive/html/plex86-devel/2002- > 12/msg00016.html looks promising on the speed frontier, now :-) Wish them luck ;) Thanks, Hetz ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
