Quoth Dan Armak on Fri, Jan 24, 2003: > On Friday 24 January 2003 14:14, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > Well, I don't use KMail... From a very brief glance at its Manual this > > seems to be specific to KMail, and will work only if all the mails > > from the list go to a particular folder that KMail *knows* to be > > associated with the list. Certainly not acceptable. > > No. If the List-* headers are present, reply-to-list will work in any > cirumstances.
I don't think many MUAs support these headers. The headers are not KMail-specific (they're documented in some RFC I can't be bothered to look up), but the behaviour of following up to the address in these headers is. > If they are not there, (e.g. linux-il) there is a workaround > which is kmail-specific: put them all in one folder and define a list address > for the folder. This is the only kmail-specific thing I mentioned. Mutt is slightly smarter: it's dependent on the header addresses, not the mail folders. (But I have a personal vendetta against KMail.) > > I am not aware of List-* headers, and unless it is something > > well-defined and standard there is no reason to add them just to help > > KMail users. It is a well-defined standard. Ely, does Listar support it? Vadik. -- Smile! The Illuminati are watching. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
