I didn't assume anything, it's just that when I do a "reply all" to
messages like yours (which I assume to have arrived to me via the list,
due to the list's "signature" at the bottom) I get

"Shachar Shemesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
as the "To" addresses.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shachar Shemesh 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Reply to list vs. no - suggeted solution to 
> accomodate everyo ne
> 
> 
> That's part of the problem. You don't have to change them. 
> For example, 
> not only is it ok, but I actually prefer if you just click 
> "reply to all".
> 
> The problem is that you don't know whether I prefer that or 
> not. You are 
> ASSUMING that, since you don't like to get two copies, I 
> wouldn't like 
> this too. In this case, this assumption is wrong.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >I'm not familiar with previous instances of this discussion, 
> I just know
> >I'm very annoyed from having to keep editing the "to" field 
> every time I
> >reply to this list.
> >
> >Why are there three addresses for this list?
> >
> Historical reasons. We can merge them, if really improtant, but that 
> would require some work, and is not really necessary.
> 
>             Shachar

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to