On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:04:01PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote: > I might not have read the license too well. Could you show me where that > is stated. What I found was (after section 2c).
The GPL FAQ at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html is interesting reading, if you're a license geek. For example, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation, "What is the difference between "mere aggregation" and "combining two modules into one program"?" and the "Combining work with code released under the GPL" section. > And here comes the question of what "reasonably independent" is. > "Derived work", as I've understood it so far, is taking some source code > and making changes on it. It's important to remember that the GPL has never been tried in court. That means that you may have your opinion what this means, and I may have mine, and our lawyers can have their (highly paid for) opinions, but ultimately, there is no precedent to what a *judge* might decide it means. -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
