On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:10:55PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote: > I don't know. I guess that now we need someone who can understand the > source. GTk 2 support Hebrew much like QT3, doesn't it? What will happen > when the package gets compiled against GTk 2?
--enable-hebrew is a hack remaining in licq from the pre-Qt3 days. It will probably break the native Hebrew (and all other languages as well) support which Qt 3 provides. I suggest you stick with the licq-plugin-qt (or licq-plugin-kde, if you're on KDE, to get even better KDE integration) and forget about --enable-hebrew. BTW, once the licq GTK backend will be ported to GTK+ 2, --enable-hebrew would confilct with it as well. All in all, it's an obsolete option. > Isn't there a bidi library which is independent of whether the program > is running in textual or graphical environment? Can QT3 or GTk bidi fribidi provides the bidi reversing algorithm. As to handling of the actual input fields, the environments differ too much for such a unified library to be possible. But all of this isn't relevant to the question at hand. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
