> -----Original Message----- > From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip] > It does. Spamming is fraud, theft and trespassing (NANAE rule > #0: Spam is > theft). That it's not outlawed doesn't make it any less > fraud, theft and > trespassing. Spammers know people don't want them to do it > and they do it > anyway until they piss off someone and get caught (NANAE rule > #3: Spammers > are stupid). While doing so they try to distract everyone by pleading > innocent (NANAE rule #1: Spammers lie). It's too bad you buy > their lies > (NANAE rule #2: If a spammers seems to be telling the truth, > see rule #1). That's your decision. These NANAE (what is that?) rules are not generally accepted by formal entities. You have to prove it first. > I'm a NANAE lurker. DIXI. NANAE? DIXI? > There is? Please show me one non-retarded, experienced user > that's not > affiliated with spammers or spammer business who would say > that spam is > legitimate and has rights to live. No wait, let's be fair and > speak real > numbers. Show me 50000 people who think that way. Milions think that O. J. Simpson was guilty, yet he was acquitted. What's your point? Billions think there is a god. So? > > Take for example the gray-market debt collectors. They will > come to you and > > hint at what will happen if you don't pay. They will apply > pressure on you > > They will hint that your family will not like it. They will send you > > (anonymously) pictures of your children at school. They > will tread on the > > fine line between harassment and a legitimate requirement > for extrication > > of the debt. > > Threat constitutes assault and is a felony punishable by criminal law. Right, the singular acts - not the practice. > And, when you say 'debt collectors', you imply that I owe > someone something. > To spammers, I don't owe jack shit. No analogy is perfect. > I see the analogy, but the analogy is not good enough. By not > being violent > criminals and having their ass covered with the anonimousity > of All Internet, > spammers commit acts of abuse of similar extent while holding > by a much more > decaying moral ground. You just proved my point. -- Arik ********************************************************************** This email and attachments have been scanned for potential proprietary or sensitive information leakage. Vidius, Inc. Protecting Your Information from the Inside Out. www.vidius.com ********************************************************************** ================================================================To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
