On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:15:08PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Shlomi Fish wrote: > > >Here are my ideas: > > > >1. Subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) - plenty of work here. > >Either bug-squashing or developing a new feature (like svn "blame" a la > >cvs annoatate) > > > >2. Syscalltrack - port to 2.5.x/2.6.x. (http://syscalltrack.sf.net/) > > Hmm, yes. Take a project whose original maintainer have more-or-less > aboundaned. Take the point that caused the maintainer to give up on it. > Give it to people with no experience in Open Source. That sounds like a > nice, solid, plan.
No, this is incorrect. Here's what I wrote about it in a personal reply yesterday: > and on a more perosnel note why don'y _you_ want to do the port? Fair question. The answer is that ever since guy keren (choo) left the project, it has largely been a one man show, and a few months ago, I got tired of working on it alone. I decided to pursue "in kernel" projects, where the ammount of collaboration is much higher. As for syscalltrack, I still like the concept, and the code. If someone came along that I could collaborate with, I would certainly consider going back to work on it. So, anyone who wants to collaborate on syscalltrack, including but not limited to a port to 2.5/2.6, give me a buzz. -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org http://www.livejournal.com/~mulix/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
