--=-ryHCtMP0Y/yb2Z/V5tY7
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:00:58PM +0300, Shany Pozin wrote:
> > 
> > My thoughts were :
> > 
> > dual xeon P3 with 2MB cache /  or dual AMD  (don't know which one yet)
> > 2GB of RAM
> > RAID0 array with two 80GB Western Digital 7200-rpm and a Raid controller
> > 2*LAN 10/100MB
> > VIDEO CARD
> > CD ROM
> > 4U case 
> 
> I get the impression you are trying to avoid a single point of failure,
> am I right?

I will try to tackle this with a load balancer.

> If that's so then what about having a cluster of at least two machines,
> there are planty of ready-made such things for Linux floating around and
> people on this list who know them much better than me....
> 
> As for using WD for the disks - not to start a religious war but they at
> least used to have bad reputation.  I got a few recommandations to shell
> out a little more and get a Maxtor (and with a very little more it also
> came with an 8Mb cache).
> 

the brand was just an example , I am looking for RADI0 best solution ,
but avoiding SCSI

> As for the dual-cpu requirement - is it a performance requirement?

yes it is , I looking for a server that will hold about 500 req/sec
serving of dynamic pages

> 
> --Amos

--------------------------------------------------
Shany P

--=-ryHCtMP0Y/yb2Z/V5tY7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.5">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:00:58PM +0300, Shany Pozin 
wrote:
&gt; 
&gt; My thoughts were :
&gt; 
&gt; dual xeon P3 with 2MB cache /  or dual AMD  (don't know which one yet)
&gt; 2GB of RAM
&gt; RAID0 array with two 80GB Western Digital 7200-rpm and a Raid controller
&gt; 2*LAN 10/100MB
&gt; VIDEO CARD
&gt; CD ROM
&gt; 4U case 

I get the impression you are trying to avoid a single point of failure,
am I right?</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
I will try to tackle this with a load balancer.
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>If that's so then what about having a cluster of at 
least two machines,
there are planty of ready-made such things for Linux floating around and
people on this list who know them much better than me....

As for using WD for the disks - not to start a religious war but they at
least used to have bad reputation.  I got a few recommandations to shell
out a little more and get a Maxtor (and with a very little more it also
came with an 8Mb cache).
</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
the brand was just an example , I am looking for RADI0 best solution , but avoiding 
SCSI
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>As for the dual-cpu requirement - is it a performance 
requirement?</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
yes it is , I looking for a server that will hold about <TT>500 req/sec serving of 
dynamic pages</TT>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>
--Amos</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<PRE><TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
--------------------------------------------------<BR>
Shany P
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</PRE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-ryHCtMP0Y/yb2Z/V5tY7--


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to