Shaul Karl wrote on 2003-07-08:

> I still don't get something. Quoting section 7 of the IP Sub-Networking
> Mini-Howto:
>
>     For the sake of this example, let us assume that you have decided to
>     subnetwork you C class IP network number 192.168.1.0 into 4 subnets
>     (each of 62 usable interface/host IP numbers). However, two of these
>     subnets are being combined into a larger single network, giving three
>     physical networks.
>     These are :-
>
>     ______________________________________________________________________
>     Network         Broadcast       Netmask                 Hosts
>     192.168.1.0     192.168.1.63    255.255.255.192         62
>     192.168.1.64    192.168.1.127   255.255.255.192         62
>     192.168.1.128   192.168.1.255   255.255.255.128         124 (see note)
>     ______________________________________________________________________
>
>     Note: the reason the last network has only 124 usable network
>     addresses (not 126 as would be expected from the network mask) is that
>     it is really a 'super net' of two subnetworks. Hosts on the other two
>     networks will interpret 192.168.1.192 as the network address of the
>     'non-existent' subnetwork. Similarly, they will interpret
>     192.168.1.191 as the broadcast address of the 'non-existent'
>     subnetwork.
>
>     So, if you use 192.168.1.191 or 192 as host addresses on the third
>     network, then machines on the two smaller networks will not be able to
>     communicate with them.
>
> \begin{interruptRequest}
>
>   How does the 2 smaller networks know that 192.168.1.191 and 192 were
> initially a broadcast and network addresses? Would they treat any one of
> 192.168.*.19[12] in the same way?
>
> \end{interruptRequest}
>
As far as I understand, they assume that sub-networking is uniform:
they know the full network mask and know it is subnetted with a given
subnet mask.  They assume it doesn't only apply to their own subnet
but to each subnet of the network.  No, they wouldn't treat
192.168.*.* in this way, the full network mask seems to be
255.255.255.0 so they only assume things about "sibling subnets" i.e.
192.168.1.*.

-- 
Beni Cherniavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If I don't hack on it, who will?  And if I don't GPL it, what am I?
And if it itches, why not now?  [With apologies to Hilel ;]

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to