Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote on 2003-07-24:

> Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
> >
> > My home network consists of 3-4 computers and an ADSL modem all
> > connected one to the other with cross RJ45 cables, with no hubs.
> > This was simplest at each point in time (it started with two computers
> > and one cable and at each point I had enough network cards) but it's
> > somewhat inconvenient because intermediate computers sometimes need to
> > be up just to pass the packets.
>
> You could also do it wit some routing tables, for example, I assume that
> you have network segment on a different subnet (shame on you if you didn't):
>
> computer 1:
>       192.168.1.1
>
> computer 2
>       192.168.1.2     crossed to computer a 192.168.1.1
>       192.168.2.2     crossed to computer c 192.168.2.3
>
> computer 3
>       192.168.2.3     crossed to computer a 192.168.2.2
>       192.168.3.3     crossed to computer c 192.168.4.3
>
> computer 4
>       192.168.3.4     crossed to computer a 192.168.3.3
>       10.0.1.1.       connected to aDSL modem.
>       xx.xx.xx.xx     ppp conection to isp.
>
> This could easily be accomdated with routing,
>
You have guessed my setup almost precisely (the ADSL modem is
connected to computer 3 and the network numbers slightly differ)!  I
already do it with routing but that means that computers 2 & 3 need to
be up for 1 to access the net even if I don't use 2 & 3 at the moment
(similar issues for some other usage cases).  That's why I want hubs.

Actualy the main issue is computer 3 which holds the connection to the
ADSL modem now; I rarely use this computer but I frequenltly use the
net so it's up most of the day.  I'd like to put a hub in front of
the modem so I can bypass this computer.  I guess there would be
complications with ppp connections - only one of the computers can
open it, so I would either designate a more useful computer (2) as the
main connector or setup the net so that any computer that went up
first can masquarade for the rest...

> > So now I consider adding one or two hubs.  But hubs need cables that
> > are not crossed.  Replacing all cables would cost a non-negligeble
> > price.  Besides one long cable passes inside the wall and replacing it
> > is out of the question.  I can re-solder all cables (or re-frob the
> > connectors but I don't have the device that does it) but I'd rather
> > avoid the trouble.
>
> It would be easier to get a short cable and a "punch down" wall jack
> and make a 1 meter adaptor cable as needed. Cost about 50 NIS each.
>
Not following you precisely but with Gilad's post the needed cables
count reduced to 2 and I just found a spare straight cable so I can
get the 1 missing cable for even less.

> > What's most annoying me about the idea is that I can see no technical
> > reason for it.  Why should non-crossed cables exist at all?  Why can't
> > the hubs have connector layout like in computers, so that
> > computer<->hub cables would be crossed too and put an end to the
> > confusion?  What do I miss?
>
Nobody addressed my "rant" point - is there any reason except market
inertia not to make all cables crossed?  I'm not in position to change
anything here but I want to know whether it's stupid or not ;-).

> Some HP switches do autodetect. However every hub I have ever seen had
> one port that had a a normal/reverse switch. That would cover the hidden
> wire. The others could just be replaced.
>
>
> Note that if you look at the plug with the wire in the back and the tab
> on top pins are numbered 1 to 8 from the left. A normal cable has 8 wires
> (4 twisted pairs) but only two pairs are used.
>
> They are pin 1 and 2 pair one, pin 3 and 6 pair two.Reveresed cables
> have one side the same, the other with pair twon on 1 and 2 and pair two
> on 3 and 6. Wires on pins 4,5,7,8 are not used and can be cut.
>
Thanks for the details.

> Are you ever in Jerusalem? If you are I can lend you the tool and I'll
> give you a handful of plugs, or you can get them sometimes at home center
> or Kashayoff on King George.
>
No, I'm near Haifa...

> > I recall that some new cards "autodetect polarity".  Does this refer
> > to polarity on each pair or also to Tx/Rx autodetection?  Is there a
> > chance that it will work with crossed cables anyway?  Is it safe to
> > experiment of do I risk letting the smoke out?
>
> Never had a problem doing so, but that does not say that ALL cards
> are safe to experiement.
>
I'll risk it.

-- 
Beni Cherniavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If I don't hack on it, who will?  And if I don't GPL it, what am I?
And if it itches, why not now?  [With apologies to Hillel ;]

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to