On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:41:14AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:

> That's the natural solution. It's ours (printed IDs) that doesn't
> look right. 

It's known as "Manoj's paranoid key signing protocol",
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html 

In my opinion, the method we currently use is safe *enough*,
considering the time required to complete each of the methods. It's
all about how paranoid you are. 

> And, keysigning parties as such don't work at all in some circumstances. 
> People sometimes want to maintain identities, and keys, for names different 
> from the one in their government files; you can't verify those using papers. 
> Or 'trustable anonymous identities' as in Freenet.

In that case, use the Manoj's method above. 
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org
http://www.livejournal.com/~mulix/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to