On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Aaron wrote: > Just for the curious could someone parphrase in english what this is all > about? > > Thanks > Aaron > > >http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-2872838,00.html
This is a full translation, full of mother tongure interferance, though. Illusions that are sold to you about Linux ----------------------------------------- By Dr. Robert m. Saur The appearance of Linux and other open source programs as serious candidates in the market of computation is an important phenomena. The challenge they pose to MS and other software manufacturers will lead to greater competition, which will yield utilities and improvements to any consumer, business or private. Still, the process of the entrance of Linux and other open source programs to the market is accompanied by strong dissonances, which only harm. Linux vendors have recently been trying to present an utopian picture, as if their merchandise is technologically perfect, and a sort of turn point in the human history in general and in the software market in private. It is an illusion. Open source programs are commercial programs in every aspect. They are characterized by a different commercial model, but like any software they have technical faults and merits. For competition to evolve, things must be presented as they are, and consumers must be allowed to choose based on real data and information. The year of Linux ------------------ Thus, for example, Mr Horev, manager of Oracle Israel, calls the year 2003 (in an article recently published in Yedioth Aharonot): "For the first time since the entrance of Linux to the market over a decade ago, the system can be viewed as a cheaper and better alternative for Windows", he says. Mr Horev relates Linux's recent success to the commercial maturity this system has achieved, and to the fact that governmental systems all around the world have adopted it. The enthusiasm of Mr Horev from Linux is certainly understandable. Oracle, which made a large bet on the future of Linux (along with other software companies), has a clear interest in the matter as the vendor. But enthusiasm from Linux is one thing, and statistical proofs about the success of Linux is a totally different thing. As a matter of fact, after examining the data, the pink picture looks totally different. for example, let us examine the part of Linux in the global servers market. According to the research company IDC, on 1995 Linux's share was about 0%. By 2000 it jumped to 28%. But what has happened since then? Linux's share stayed more or less the same, and even dropped a bit. On the other hand, Windows's share in the global market of servers grew steadily in the said period: from 18% on 1995 to 49% on 2001. From the data it appears that Windows system does not lose height significantly. It seems that Linux entered the market at the expense of UNIX, much more than at the expense of Windows. Is Linux a lot Cheaper? --------------------- And what about the cost of Linux when compared to Windows? Is it not true that Linux is cheaper by far? Surprisingly enough, it is not necessarily so. the most reliable comparative cost review done so far (IDC's 2002 review) found out that the total cost of ownership of Windows is 11%-22% lower than Linux systems, according to the type of task, and only in one type Linux is 6% cheaper. Is the adoption of Linux by governments indeed so frequent, and does this signify technological superiority in any way? attempts to prefer open source as a rule by means of legislation have faced strong resistance and failed all over the world.In Israel, a law initiative on the subject by Kneset Member Nehama Ronen was overruled on this background. The state of Massachusetts has gone back on its intention to switch all the information systems to open source several days ago. It must be kept in mind, that governmental authorities are not always good at choosing the best companies in a competitional market, and they sometimes drag after passing fashions. The clerks of the ministry of finance, who have recently lead a public war against MS and for open source, have decided in the end to buy MS programs for full prince and continue to use them in the next years in all government ministries. Leave Philosophy to Philosophers -------------------------------- It appears that a militant rhetoric speaking is not a substitute to a thorough examination of technological efficiency, which brought to the decision in this case as well. And finally, one cannot stand being amused by the philosophic spirit which accompanies the marketing efforts of Linux and other open source programs today, which are described as the incarnation of the freedom and democracy. The vendors, such as IBM, Oracle and Sun, have not reached cycles of tens of billions of dollars from selling licenses of freedom and democracy, but from selling software licenses. Even when they supposedly sell cheap Linux, they sell for a very high price completing products and expensive computation services. so to the managers of the vending companies it shall be said: Leave the philosophy to the philosophers, and you go out to the market and sell programs in a simple, to the point, language. Good Luck. ------ The author is an economics lecturer in the Hebrew Uni in Jerusalem, the the president of the Jerusalem institute for market research. --------------------- ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
