On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:03:08PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Of course a *good* solution (as opposed to a crappy one) will need to be
> very sensitive to the problem of false-positives - genuine email mistakenly
> thought to be spam. When I wrote "90%" above I meant a 10% false-negative
> rate, and a tiny false-positive rate. Again, this isn't rocket science.
> It is doable, and if it weren't, I would not have been able to read my
> email in the last 5 years.

I have found that one way to cut down on spam is to use spamassian. It
gives me about 5-10 false negatives a day. I prefer false negatives,
i.e. spam getting through, to false positives, i.e. loosing messages.

I cut down the overhead by using a procmail .rc file that places known
high volume senders, e.g. yahoo mailing lists directly into my mail
box without passing it through spamassian.

The person who provides my email runs a very tight antispam system which
he acts as an email forwarder and sells his service. I decided not to
use it as there were 1-2 messages a day that failed his rules, mostly
because one person who emailed me did it from a blacklisted network.

To me it was better to have to do the filtering myself as I know what I
am doing (those who know me may say otherwise) than have to get angry
emails from this one person whom I needed to get regular emails from
and refused to "fix" his "broken" system.

Geoff.

-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED]  N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (077)-424-1667  IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 
VoN  Skype: mendelsonfamily. Looking for work as a CTO or consultant in 
handheld gaming, large systems development, handheld device construction, etc.
See U.S. patent applications  20050108591,  20050107165.

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to