On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:25:36PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sep 26, 10:26, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> } Subject: Re: Actcom without a dailer costs more
> 3. Even though routers are tend to connect 24x7, yet with dynamic IPs
> there is still a need for significantly less IPs.

Care to explain why? Not on-average, but for those who do have 24x7
connections. I do realize that if you give a static IP to every customer,
there is still a significant percentage that are far from 24x7, and they
would need much fewer addresses if they are dynamic.

> > I'd also like to thank you for your sincere and interesting answers.
> 
>   I hope I was of some help here, even though I couldn't tell the "the
> real price for the ISP to give a user a static IP".

I was misunderstood - I did not intend to thank you for an answer to my
question (and I also did not expect to get something like "5 NIS/year.
Happy?"), but for other things you already said and were interesting to
read.

Thanks,
-- 
Didi


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to