On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> > Ok, let's contrast them. Bitkeeper was about storing your most vital > > information in a proprietary format that wanted strange terms to get (at > > least if you didn't want to put out money). > > Including an http transaction to their servers everytime you did > something. .. if you were using the free version. The paid version did not log anything to bitkeeper's servers. > Personaly, I would not want a third party to even know the names of the > modules I was working on. I used to work for a large financial services > company. We were not allowed to discuss the type and number of computers > we had outside of the company, because a competitor could then use the > information to figure out what we were working on. Not that I have any love lost for bk, but would such a financial company use the free bk version? highly doubtful. Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
