On 7/27/06, Geoffrey S. Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're confusing free as in the GPL and free as in beer. The GPL does not
restrict people from charging for their products, it requires that if you
release the source code for them.

But is it or is it not legal to install the binary (compiled) version
on more computers without a license?  GPL should be free, also when
using the binary form of the software.

There is a gray area,

It looks as if this gray area is big enough, so that it could happen
that companies will take a distribution of Linux, modify it, maybe add
some proprietary software to it, and then sell it as a proprietary
software - like MS-Windows.  They may also include technical means to
prevent people from installing it without a license (such as
"activation" in Windows XP).  The yearly subscription for online
security patches is a step in this direction.

Uri.

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to