that can actually be a good a argument for a bagatz in the unlikely event that this idiotic proposal will pass, that can hold off the implementation of this potential law for a few good months.
On 3/2/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't want to get into a debate about porn. That's for each person to decide. BUT, I do think that there are LINUX issues here too. What happens if the law says you have to have a specific type of content filter and/or a specific way of identification for those who DO want porn to be available? You can bet that these will be Windows specific tools. On Friday 02 March 2007 12:44, Yonah Russ wrote: > I'm confused... is there any parent that wants their kids to freely and > easily access pornography? Halevai the UN would treat pornography like they > treat nuclear weapons. > -Yonah > > On 3/2/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We (more exactly *you*) are about to join Iran, China and North Korea. > > Are you ready ? > > > > http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3371412,00.html > > > > Peter P. > > > > ================================================================= > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Shlomo Solomon http://the-solomons.net Sent by KMail (KDE 3.5.4) on LINUX Mandriva 2007 ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Dvir Volk CTO, ilcu.com http://www.ilcu.com
