Elazar Leibovich <[email protected]> writes: > Just a remark, as some people asked me about it privately. > > I'm not interested in static analysis (which gcc gives for > uninitialized variables). But with runtime analysis of where the > uninitialized variable have been actually used when the code was > run. This is useful in many situations (for instance, when having > 3000 (literally) static warnings, some of similar spirit, and no > time to check them all) > > I didn't find anything parallel to that for gcc.
Do you insist on gcc (or FOSS)? If you are willing to try a commercial product definitely try Insure++ from ParaSoft. I have not touched it for a while, but I have *very* fond memories. The only drawback I recall was that applications ran slower than with gcc due to all the instrumentation it inserts. But man, does it find bugs!... http://www.parasoft.com (no, I don't own the stock). I have not checked, but they used to have evaluation. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
