>>"Kedar" == Kedar Patankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kedar> I have used both, but sendmail much more extensively than
Kedar> postfix. To me postfix appears to be more scalable, *very*
Kedar> well designed, and much more robust/secure, and *very* easy to
Kedar> maintain/administer compared to sendmail.
Agreed. Postfix is better for large loads as well (I prefer
its sending policy under load better than even qmails)
Kedar> The only reason why I haven't switched to postfix in a big way is
Kedar> "inertia" and "don't fix it if it ain't broken".
Also, sendmail's config language is turing complete ;-) That
ought to count for something (the fact that in 99.999& of the cases
one doesn't need the added flexibility is besides the point).
manoj
--
Nothing succeeds like the appearance of success. Christopher Lascl
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech. But it was created for a purpose - to help
people discuss issues about installing and running Linux. If your
messages are counterproductive to this purpose, your privileges to
submit messages can and will be revoked.
