> Share level security has its own limitations. If you want to revoke
> rights to an user for share, you have to change the password for the share
> and communicate the change to everybody except him. Also, you may need the
> users to remember so many passwords - one for each share etc. User level
> security is more better - you get finer control - Particulary in an
> environment with 60 machines.
>
It is true, denying access to a particular user is difficult. But in our
case each person using their own machines and 'deny hosts = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'
will work.
with 'security = share' and 'public = yes' (for guest access) there is no
need of passwords to access resources. After all we share only "shareble
resources", no?
**************************************************************
John Thomas V.,
Information Technology Officer,
Avenir Computer Services Exports Pvt. Ltd.,
Cochin - 682024, India.
Phone: +91-484-339 613, 340 469, 330 855, 330 858
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Nobody has a monopoly on the truth"
**************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech. But it was created for a purpose - to help
people discuss issues about installing and running Linux. If your
messages are counterproductive to this purpose, your privileges to
submit messages can and will be revoked.
