Deepak Kapoor wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sachin Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Linux-India-General
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 9:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [LIH] Which is better AMD or INTEL
>
> > Deepak Kapoor wrote:
> > >
> > > Amd is definatetly better because of its higher FSB
> > > which will make your system run faster
> > >
> > > > Is any body suggest me which is better AMD or INTEL. is there any idea
> to
> > > > divert towards AMD. as per specifications, AMD is better than Celeron,
> > > what
> > > > about the practical i don't know. presently i am using intel celeron
> > > 533Mhz.
> > > > should i divert to AMD K6-2, 500MHz. i am very confused. any body
> helps
> > > me.
> >
> > The higher FSB is only in the Athlon derivatives (Athlon Classic, Athlon
> > Thunderbird and Athlon Duron) which use the EV6 bus signalling protocol
> > that AMD has licensed from Digital (now Compaq).
> >
> > Socket 7 (K6-*) don't have that, but have 3D!Now instructions.
> >
> > sachin
> but AMD k6-2 do have FSB speed of 83Mhz which is greater than 66Mhz in case
> of celeron
I thought u meant DDR FSB. Also, Celeron has been *artificially* clocked
down by Intel. It seems the chip has an amazing overclocking potential,
but so does the Duron/T-Bird.
sachin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on the LIH mailing list see:
http://lists.linux-india.org/lists/LIH
