On 11/07/00 18:55 +0530, Madhu M. Kurup spewed into the LI bitstream:
> Personally, I use pine for personal mails and stuff, and mutt for all
> my group mails - the advantage with mutt is that with threads neatly
> tucked and ordered, you can intelligently follow a conversation. >
Why do you want to do this? Mutt supports different identities, and you
can keep personal mails in one folder, have one folder for each list mail
etc etc. No need to touch pine at all ;)
> And like all Unix tools, Pine and Mutt interoperate, plus you can define
> Pine style macros into mutt.... I had posted a question some time ago,
> poke at the archives.
Heh ... pine style macros in mutt? That is, you want to change the
keybindings of mutt to resemble pine?
Yeah, you can do that ... the sample bindings for pine, mush, tin etc are
there in /usr/local/doc/mutt/samples - along with the .muttrcs of Roessler
and Mike Elkins ;)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information on this and other Linux India mailing lists check out
http://lists.linux-india.org/
